Discussions are as useful as they add some new information to the topic.
And meanwhile "information" term is not that many think it is. Say, sentence "Sky is blue" have zero information. However, say, "Sky is blue because of Rayleigh scattering on air atoms" have. Real question is "why?".
There is no any information in all that "libs are insane", "cyanide is a poison" or "jews are greedy". You could have a whole intense discussion you love a lot on such topics, but it doesn't bring you anything without information. You just spent time, and that's all.
Aaaah, another one of your comments, where you type too much and say nothing...
We went over this before, didn't we? Or perhaps you don't remember?
That's what I like in the other forums - if you're useless, or non-productive, people call you out on this. Even in reddit, as hard as that is to believe. I'll give you one example:
There was this post in r/conspiracy, clearly promoted by shills/bots, where they were trying to confuse the people that those jews in New York pulling that matras with blood stains on it was just, and I quote, "a bunch of rubble"...
However, the comments immediately exposed the lie by saying how absurd is the notion that rubble would leave a brown stain in the center, while the matras is without scratches, which is what rubble would do to it.
I made a post about the absurdity of the upvotes, while the comments all exposed this fake post as a lie, and got a very good discussion there. Something lost in here. I mean, just read your comment again... With, or without it, there is no difference.
That's why even controlled reddit is better than here. Notice, is someone else calling you out on your empty comment? No discussion whatsoever... Empty.
That's what I like in the other forums - if you're useless, or non-productive, people call you out on this.
OP is useless and non-productive.
If OP desired progress it would have defined how progress is achieved other than people already agreeing with OP or coming around to agree with OP. Hint: the alternative is by OP coming around to yield an inch or two.
Discussions are as useful as they add some new information to the topic.
And meanwhile "information" term is not that many think it is. Say, sentence "Sky is blue" have zero information. However, say, "Sky is blue because of Rayleigh scattering on air atoms" have. Real question is "why?".
There is no any information in all that "libs are insane", "cyanide is a poison" or "jews are greedy". You could have a whole intense discussion you love a lot on such topics, but it doesn't bring you anything without information. You just spent time, and that's all.
Aaaah, another one of your comments, where you type too much and say nothing...
We went over this before, didn't we? Or perhaps you don't remember?
That's what I like in the other forums - if you're useless, or non-productive, people call you out on this. Even in reddit, as hard as that is to believe. I'll give you one example:
There was this post in r/conspiracy, clearly promoted by shills/bots, where they were trying to confuse the people that those jews in New York pulling that matras with blood stains on it was just, and I quote, "a bunch of rubble"...
However, the comments immediately exposed the lie by saying how absurd is the notion that rubble would leave a brown stain in the center, while the matras is without scratches, which is what rubble would do to it.
I made a post about the absurdity of the upvotes, while the comments all exposed this fake post as a lie, and got a very good discussion there. Something lost in here. I mean, just read your comment again... With, or without it, there is no difference.
That's why even controlled reddit is better than here. Notice, is someone else calling you out on your empty comment? No discussion whatsoever... Empty.
OP is useless and non-productive.
If OP desired progress it would have defined how progress is achieved other than people already agreeing with OP or coming around to agree with OP. Hint: the alternative is by OP coming around to yield an inch or two.
See?
Another proof of a bot that wants to reduce discussion.
Thank you!