Anti-vaxx Redditor debunks graphene disinfo
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
In my own experience, I found at least some of the graphene theory pushers, like Karen Kingston and Todd Callender to be complete frauds.
I hadn't yet seen a rebuttal of Dr. Pablo Campra's work which the Fifth Column bases so much of it's analysis on. Though my bs alarm went off right away when Fifth Column originally declared the shot was "99%" graphene which is simply not possible. This looks like the final nail in the coffin for graphene.
What is your issue with Karen Kingston? To be fair I have not kept up with her in over a year but she was one of the first people bringing actual documents with the proper background to explain them.
Here is more info. Take the wayback machine in SINOPEG website for ALC 0159 she mentions in the Stew Peters interview, and it has no mention of graphene.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220925130302/https://www.sinopeg.com/2-polyethylene-glycol-2000-n-n-ditetradecylacetamide-mpeg-dta-alc-0159-cas-1849616-42-7_p477.html
Same for this entry on PEG 2000 https://web.archive.org/web/20211016074831/https://www.sinopeg.com/polyethylene-glycol-peg-2000-dimyristoyl-glycerol-dmg-mpeg2000-dmg-cas-160743-62-4_p479.html
Interview: https://prepareforchange.net/2021/08/27/former-pfizer-employee-confirms-poison-graphene-oxide-in-vaxxxine/
Look how this snake transitions from talking about PEG they make into talking about graphene without explicitly stating that the chemical MSDS she cited contains graphene.