Anti-vaxx Redditor debunks graphene disinfo
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
In my own experience, I found at least some of the graphene theory pushers, like Karen Kingston and Todd Callender to be complete frauds.
I hadn't yet seen a rebuttal of Dr. Pablo Campra's work which the Fifth Column bases so much of it's analysis on. Though my bs alarm went off right away when Fifth Column originally declared the shot was "99%" graphene which is simply not possible. This looks like the final nail in the coffin for graphene.
What is your issue with Karen Kingston? To be fair I have not kept up with her in over a year but she was one of the first people bringing actual documents with the proper background to explain them.
I checked the patents she cited and they didn't say what she alleged at all.
She claimed proof for Graphene from some technical document on a Chinese chemical manufacturer for a chemical that had nothing to do with the covid vaccine. Just because a manufacturer has a compound with graphene, that in no way states this is in the vaccine.
She claimed it was 100% proof that graphene was in the vaccines. If she knows how to read, which she does, this is a clear lie.
Here is the evidence laid out in a website. They seem to be taken in by it, but if you read the SINOPEG document it is a special form of PEG they are talking about. No where does it state this is in the vaccines.
https://prepareforchange.net/2021/08/27/former-pfizer-employee-confirms-poison-graphene-oxide-in-vaxxxine/