It's Official: Jews Exempt From Masks!
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Engine/engin - "trick, deceit, stratagem; war machine"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/engine
Maybe a suggested search engine only tricks one to find something, while tempting one to ignore that everything perceivable is the foundation for ones perception?
Like how the jew Maksymilian Faktorowicz (Max Factor) made up "make up"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Factor_Sr.
...as if there's another source for ones perception than all perceivable.
Knowledge implies perception, belief implies suggestion...consenting to latter tempts one to ignore former.
Knowledge implies naturally inherent...believing implies artificially extrinsic.
The suggested explanations you looked for imply "consenus"...not ones perceiving senses. While you are trying to join a consensus with others, nature sets all perceivable and each ones perception apart from one another, so that senses can perceive moving differences.
A jew utilizes suggested information to tempt consent from each gentile, while shaping mass consensus out of it aka collectivization aka herding cattle.
Nature doesn't give explanations...nature implies plane of action for expressions within. One has to discern self as expression (life) within the plane (inception towards death) of all action.
Seeking an explanations implies looking towards outcomes..being ex within plane of ation implies adaption to origin. That's how one suggested word (explanation) can distract from all perceivable (ex-plan-ation)...if one consents to it.
Wanting from another makes one uneven. Being implies odd (choice) within even (balance)...inclining towards another imbalances self.
Re-cogn-tion implies ones response to knowledge of action...which seeking recognition from others inverts.
Because natural law moves forwards, while suggested laws (legal) tempt those who believe to hold onto them, for which natural law demands payback aka retribution.
A jew sets up the legal system to distract gentiles from natural law...which when ignored forces retribution upon gentiles, which a jew exploits.
It's not that hard to discern this for self...while almost impossible to explain to others.
a) A people cannot be entire...people implies an accumulation of partials within whole. Only nature implies entire...not the shit we slap together within.
In other words...every moment(um) a jew is born and a jew dies, so there can never be an entire jewish people within the momentum of motion. YET...a gentiles can be tricked to believe that an accumulation represents an entirety.
An example for such a trick...a puzzle. One cannot put a puzzle together into its entirety, because each part was cut apart from one another, so there will always be a "space" in-between partials. A gentile willingly ignores that the entire picture was on the box, and that the pieces within can never achieve the clarity thereof.
That's an allegory for nature...suggestion can never achieve the clarity of perception.
b) Race/raddix/radius/ray....not something one joins, but that which sets one apart from others. A jew suggests race-ism to tempt consenting gentiles together and thereby against each other...no matter which side they choose to join.
a) Nature sets units apart from one another... a jew suggests United States (US) to tempt gentiles together.
b) Light sets rays apart from one another within a visible spectrum aka in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light). A jew suggests the masonic checkerboard to tempt gentiles to choose white or black, while ignoring the visible spectrum of light aka the very rainbow a jew suggests for equality through diversity.
c) Being implies person aka by (per) sound (sonos)...a jew suggests for example "we the people" and "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one) to tempt gentiles together.
Each person implies resonance within sound; any accumulation into people implies dissonance within sound, hence each jew representing a chosen ONE.
Shit aside...a piece implies a corruption (life) within whole (inception towards death), which is why life has to struggle within the process of dying to sustain itself.
All perceivable implies "value of justice"; each ones perception implies "evaluation by judge"...judging each other with suggestions tempts one to ignore justice, hence establishing injustice for one another.
Perception is the judge; perceivable the executioner, and suggestions the jury trying to trick the judge with offense vs defense (reason) into giving a mistrial (consent).
Being implies as judge of ones life, while being executed by the ongoing process of dying. Consenting to others implies that one didn't even TRY to sustain self, which is ones TRIAL within nature.
A jew suggests Judge Dredd to tempt gentiles to "fear judging" self...by letting others pass the judgement.