Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

5
What is missed by such statements is the layers to the TPTB Tier System. Some go, "they are saying it out loud" but never ask "why say it" What these moments reveal is how these people are functional puppets. They are NOT leaders of conspiracies but compliant to curated beliefs, to then influence. (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by pkvi_sacrum 1 year ago by pkvi_sacrum +7 / -2
6 comments share
6 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– PiraticalPatri0t 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

sure but Crowley's teachings say free will always needs to be there...

if they dont provide a chance for a choice in the intended subjects...

the spell wont work...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

free will always needs to be there...

a) Always aka "way of all" implies the need for each one struggling with want within.

b) A being with free will of choice exists within the need of all way, hence choice needing balance.

c) Hiding "all way" underneath "always" implies occultism.

a chance for a choice

Choice needs to adapt to perceivable origin (balance); chance tempts choice to gamble on suggested outcomes, which imbalances choice.

if they dont provide

Nature provides implication (if/then)...few within pretend to provide reason (do vs don't). Implication implies balance; reason implies imbalance...if one chooses to hold onto a side aka if one gambles on chance within a conflict of winning vs loosing.

the intended subjects

Intend/intendere "stretching forwards" implies ones consent stretching towards the suggested information by another aka WANT to hold onto over NEED to let go of.

Ones choice is subjected to balance...the suggested choices by others tempt one to subject self by consenting to a side within imbalance.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy