Impale them instead.
Hear me out.
I never understood why DEPORTATION was ever considered a consequence for a crime in the first place. Let's be hypothetical.
You're a dirty, dumb, Mexican scumbag spic. Some kind of hybrid of a filthy savage dwarf Mayan or Aztec hobbit whore and a Horny Spaniard Sailor who scrubbed the barnacles off the ships.
You can commit crimes in your home town in Mexico. But then you go to a dirty Mexican prison. But if you go to USA instead, you can commit crimes and the worst that can happen to you is you get sent back home to your home town in Mexico. No threat of prison. The USA only threatens deportation and they don't even go through with that because it's "racist"
So you get let loose inside the USA again to commit more crime. And again, they will not imprison you. The greatest threat is deportation meaning if your crimes fail and you get caught outside a sanctuary city then the worst that happens is you get deported back home in time for grandma's birthday.
Deportation is foolish because it is not a real punishment for invading a Supreme White Nation. Impale everyone who invades the USA illegally. Also shut down all immigration entirely for several years. Make it valuable to be a USA citizen again instead of a free for all. Also if immigration is opened back up then require that millions of Whites be imported to offset the illegal invasion by non-Whites in an attempt that they themselves admit was aimed toward making Whites a minority inside their own nations. Reverse this trend by making it legal, required policy.
Any unwelcomed boats will be sent back out to sea or else taken prisoners and forced to do one year of hard manual labor at port to fund their raft back to Africa or whatever shithole they came from. Give border patrol immunity and freedom to shoot whoever they want for any reason they can justify to their superior. Place pikes on top of buoys as warnings to those who attempt to invade by sea.
Build the wall out of pikes. Since you will be impaling illegal aliens, there's millions of pikes that can cover the entire linear distance of the USA / Mexico border. The border there is 1,951 miles long. If you catch 10,000,000 illegal aliens and impale them all you can place a pike every single foot distance, which would be very close vicinity and basically a solid wall of pikes.
10,000,000 / 1951 miles = 5,126
There's 5,280 feet in a mile or 5,126 pikes in a mile if we can catch and impale 10million illegal alien invaders.
Crime/krei - "to sieve; to pour out"; hence deportare - "to carry off". The exploited issue...carrying off implies burdening self with, while pouring out implies in accordance with the natural order.
A jew exploits the natural flow of migration, while burdening gentiles with carrying off the artificial migrants from their native environments.
...never what another suggests you to be, unless consenting to it.
Hence UNITED states promoting the best case scenario as mixing together.
Homing implies guided to a destination, hence life being guided from inception towards death. Living within the process of dying implies "homing migration".
Each one wields WILL...suggested pluralism (they) tempts one to ignore that.
Self destructive even, hence migration (inception towards death) tempting deportation (life) to ignore resisting.
The trick few are utilizing is suggesting many to consent to "USA" as a destination, while directing migration towards it. Many ignore that oneself becomes the destination of the suggestions by others if consenting to it, which is why a US citizen cannot hide anywhere from migration homing into the beacon of ones consensual ignorance.
...permits others to define value by suggestion, while one ignores being evaluation (perception) within moving value (perceivable). Permitting others to set a price...sells ones FREE will of choice out.
An inversion of all (motion) forwarding (momentum) each ones (matter) free will of choice...
UNITED STATES invites the disassociated. As for invade (entering in a hostile manner)...hostility enters (inception) and exits (death) being (life). Process of dying implies "hostile host" for life within.
White implies "pure light"...minimum and maximum can only exist among rays within the visible spectrum of light. Black implies "absence of light", which can only exist within light by ones free will of choice to ignore (dark) discernment (bright).
White implies utmost; black implies nearest...letting go of what one holds nearest allows ones sight utmost clarity.
Only within natural law can artifice be made legal or illegal.
Refers to jewish freemasons building the wall of mass ignorance within gentile minds, while utilizing suggested information as bricks and consent as mortar. That's the wall a jew bewails, while filling the cracks with wishes...
a) Nature already forces death (motion) through life (matter)...
b) Consider the jewish PALE of a settled mind...
Understanding the Etymology and Implications of “Crime” and “Deportare”
To analyze the terms “crime” and “deportare,” we must first delve into their etymological roots and how they relate to concepts of burdening and natural order. Etymology of “Crime”
The word “crime” originates from the Latin term “crimen,” which means an accusation or offense. The root “krei,” meaning “to sieve” or “to pour out,” suggests a process of filtering or separating. This can be interpreted as a metaphor for distinguishing between acceptable behavior and unacceptable behavior in society. The act of sieving implies a careful examination, while pouring out could symbolize the release or expression of something that is inherent or natural.
In this context, crime can be seen as a deviation from societal norms that are established through collective agreement on what constitutes acceptable behavior. The implication here is that crime burdens individuals and society by disrupting the natural order, leading to consequences that require intervention. Etymology of “Deportare”
The term “deportare,” which translates to “to carry off,” also has significant implications. It combines the prefix “de-” (indicating removal) with “portare” (to carry). This suggests an action where something is taken away from its original place, often against the will of the individual involved.
When we consider deportation in a modern context, it often refers to the removal of individuals from one jurisdiction to another, typically due to legal violations. This act can be seen as both a burden on those being deported—who may face separation from family, community, and culture—and as an enforcement mechanism intended to maintain societal order. Implications of Carrying Off vs. Pouring Out
The distinction between carrying off (as in deportation) and pouring out (as in crime) highlights different aspects of human experience:
Conclusion
In summary, both terms reflect complex social dynamics where actions have profound implications on individuals and communities. Crime represents a departure from accepted norms that burdens society; deportation signifies a forced removal that disrupts lives but is justified by legal frameworks aimed at maintaining order.
Accusing or offending implies one another, while ignoring that the origin of being offers (loss) charges (growth).
Before one can shape a metaphor (figure of speech)...all sound separates into each one instrument (structured mind within).
Procession implies all perceivable moving through each ones perception, while a suggestion tempts ones consent to hold onto it...thereby contradicting procession.
Nature pours flow (inception towards death) through form (life), which allows being to come into (inception) and out of (death) origin.
EXPRESS (inherent) ION (extrinsic)...hence extrinsic action generating inherent re-actions.
a) Before ONE can collectively agree...ALL separated (crime/krei) each ONE from one another, which one ignores when consenting to suggested collectivism.
b) Nature doesn't generate norms...it utilizes equal (action) to generate odds (reactions), hence inspiring odd growth (life) during equal loss (inception towards death).
c) Check this out... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm#etymonline_v_9797
Norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square". The compass implies logic/reason btw...
Action cannot take...only give reactions. Reactions can choose to ignore everything given (perception) for pretending to give (suggestion) and take (consent) from one another.
Origin implies A WAY (inception towards death)...a wanderer (life) cannot take anything AWAY from origin; only draw out of, while being within it.
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies velocity aka violence (inception towards death) upon resistance (life).
Ignoring to resist by following suggested laws permits others to violate one, hence law ENFORCEment...
One (matter) cannot see action (motion)...only reactions (momentum). Few suggest actors to tempt reacting many to ignore that.
Order (inception towards death) doesn't need to be maintained...it's steady. Chaos (life) requires maintenance, hence it being unstable.
Few suggest order out of chaos to tempt many with progressivism to order each other out of existence...hence all the chaos.
Nature implies the solution (inception towards death) to each problem (life) within...few tempt many to solve problems by seeking solutions.
Reason (vs) contradicts implication (if/then)...
Quest implies towards outcome, hence being (life) carried off (inception towards death)...raising implies resisting being carried off.
Nature processes curves (life) apart from each other during line (inception towards death)...few suggest many to follow the mainstream party-line to align curves with line aka to reduces waves made...makes piracy easier.
Evaluation (ones perception) cannot collect value (all perceivable)...since nature moves. Few tempt many to hold onto (consent) fictitious values (suggested), which nature moves out of their grasp.
Nature implies inclusion, hence all including each one within.
If energy implies all in one; then what else besides one for all and all for one?
tl;dr...again great effort. Thanks for the inspiration.
Again. Cut and paste bot spam.
a) Community Rules: To prevent SPAM...
b) Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of...spam...may all be removed at moderator's discretion.
Why openly spam as a member of a community? Why call out another member for responding uniquely to your "cut and past bot spam"?