Just like any substance, such as alcohol or tobacco, the use of marijuana can be beneficial when done by a person with discipline, intelligence, and self-awareness. It can very easily make you into a zombie who is happy accomplishing nothing, but it can have physical health benefits and be a boon to creativity when used correctly.
Based on what I've observed in this world, there is no reason to ever expect the masses to act responsibly without the threat of immediate force. Unless you want to create a police state where all actions are monitored (which has desirable results in some ways but imo the ends don't justify the means and it would probably be in the hands of the malicious anyway), marijuana should be legal and welfare should be depleted. Then, nature will do it's thing to people who self select out of the gene pool
Vet them, make them sign some kind of contract, only send certain passages to certain people, use an alias (if you were planning to do that when it releases)
I don't know specifically what you're concerned about with a breach of trust but surely there's a solution to it.
I've smoked weed and it's been long enough where I can openly admit that I've also sold it for well over a decade.
You're not telling me anything new. I've seen how the vast majority of dumbed down Americans (who are, by large, leftwingers) all smoke weed. Not a coincidence. You want more liberal immigration (rhetorical question)? You make weed legal. Period.
And, yes, the vast majority of weed smokers are leftists. If you think I'm wrong, then California, Colorado, and New York should be the reddest states in the US. Weed does not make you a conspiracy theorist or RWer. That's just retarded.
You don't realize that you're being a useful idiot and aiding the communists you claim to be against.
So your claim is that weed makes people liberal? CA, Colorado, and NY were deep blue before the drug's legalization. Yet somehow you're claiming anyone disagreeing with you would take the stance that weed makes people into republicans?
You may not realize it, but your post has made a compelling argument against marijuana usage just not in the way you intended
My claim is that the vast majority of weed smokers are liberals.
Whether correlation = causation is another thing, but I sure as hell ain't gonna find out and make my state a test subject for some retarded social experiment that doesn't have any evidence to deny the claim otherwise, especially when you can look around the states where weed is legal/decriminalized and see that, not only are they all deep blue states, they're also fucking shitholes that normal people are moving away from.
Here's a thought: if you want weed legalized so badly, why not move to California, Colorado, or New York?
If you don't think weed is worth moving to a blue state shithole, then accept the fact that red states know what they're doing instead of subverting us and trying to turn us into the blue states and ideology you're trying to get away from.
This reply displays a lack of emotional regulation and inability to engage without it being against a strawman, which again, combined with your admitted history, makes a better case for not using marijuana than the content of the post itself
Just like any substance, such as alcohol or tobacco, the use of marijuana can be beneficial when done by a person with discipline, intelligence, and self-awareness. It can very easily make you into a zombie who is happy accomplishing nothing, but it can have physical health benefits and be a boon to creativity when used correctly.
Based on what I've observed in this world, there is no reason to ever expect the masses to act responsibly without the threat of immediate force. Unless you want to create a police state where all actions are monitored (which has desirable results in some ways but imo the ends don't justify the means and it would probably be in the hands of the malicious anyway), marijuana should be legal and welfare should be depleted. Then, nature will do it's thing to people who self select out of the gene pool
IN CLINICAL, SCIENTIFIC OR PHARMACOLOGICAL SETTINGS. NOT AS A FUCKING PERSONAL DRUG. Utter nonsense.
I still don't understand why you haven't tried to crowd source the editing on your book
How can I trust anyone?
Vet them, make them sign some kind of contract, only send certain passages to certain people, use an alias (if you were planning to do that when it releases)
I don't know specifically what you're concerned about with a breach of trust but surely there's a solution to it.
I've smoked weed and it's been long enough where I can openly admit that I've also sold it for well over a decade.
You're not telling me anything new. I've seen how the vast majority of dumbed down Americans (who are, by large, leftwingers) all smoke weed. Not a coincidence. You want more liberal immigration (rhetorical question)? You make weed legal. Period.
And, yes, the vast majority of weed smokers are leftists. If you think I'm wrong, then California, Colorado, and New York should be the reddest states in the US. Weed does not make you a conspiracy theorist or RWer. That's just retarded.
You don't realize that you're being a useful idiot and aiding the communists you claim to be against.
So your claim is that weed makes people liberal? CA, Colorado, and NY were deep blue before the drug's legalization. Yet somehow you're claiming anyone disagreeing with you would take the stance that weed makes people into republicans?
You may not realize it, but your post has made a compelling argument against marijuana usage just not in the way you intended
My claim is that the vast majority of weed smokers are liberals.
Whether correlation = causation is another thing, but I sure as hell ain't gonna find out and make my state a test subject for some retarded social experiment that doesn't have any evidence to deny the claim otherwise, especially when you can look around the states where weed is legal/decriminalized and see that, not only are they all deep blue states, they're also fucking shitholes that normal people are moving away from.
Here's a thought: if you want weed legalized so badly, why not move to California, Colorado, or New York?
If you don't think weed is worth moving to a blue state shithole, then accept the fact that red states know what they're doing instead of subverting us and trying to turn us into the blue states and ideology you're trying to get away from.
This reply displays a lack of emotional regulation and inability to engage without it being against a strawman, which again, combined with your admitted history, makes a better case for not using marijuana than the content of the post itself