My bet is on enslavement because I doubt enough people have the spine to fight back.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Bro it’s a cycle always has been. The jew never wins.
Really? They’ve done pretty well for themselves in the last 5,800 years. They own the entire planet right now. When’s your “cycle” going to show its hand for the first time, hmm?
Two more weeks
Imagine believing the Jew written history lol.
Just go the fuck away. You people aren’t even human. It’s not worth our time.
Yeah they might be winning but you can’t control that so WHY be so fucking emotional. Especially over the internet lol. So depressing and pathetic.
History is cyclical but it ultimately is linear and the prophecies of Revelation will come to pass. They will enslave humanity in the end but their rule will be short lived. Then Christ will put an end to it all.
Nature implies linear (inception towards death)...his artificial story tempts many to reason against each other, hence ignoring linear perception for circular logic about suggestion.
Coming to be (life) within passing (inception towards death) implies a revelation aka RE (reaction) VEIL (exposed to sight) ATION (action).
Action (inception towards death) exposes reactions (life) to sight (perception)...few utilize suggestion aka prophets (one who speaks for god) to distract many from perception.
Nah...only ones free WILL of choice can enslave itself by consent to the suggested will of another.
Slave (ones consent) selects master (another ones suggestion), while ignoring that nature (all perceivable) sets free (each ones perception).
Hue of man implies the visible spectrum of all light setting apart each one ray within. If a ray consents to another rays suggestion, then a shadow is cast (ignorance) within light (discernment).
Being implies in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death)...being cannot exist IN the beginning or IN the end, only IN-between, hence separated within whole and differentiated from one another.
a) Many willingly consent to follow the rules willed by few...towards death. It's not the rules of few that are short lived; but the many consenting to follow along who are willingly self sacrificing themselves for few.
b) Rule/regere/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule#etymonline_v_16625
There can be (life) only one rule (inception towards death)..."rules" imply suggested pluralism by few tempting each ONE of many to ignore to sustain ONEself within the only ONE rule.
Christ/christen - "to anoint" implies coming to be into life. God implies all putting each one Christ (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
Will implies want...God implies need. Each anointed one within all needs to resist wanted temptation by free will of choice.
I don't see reductionism as meaningful (taking words out of the context implied and analyzing them on their own) but you did good here.
Con (together; with) text/teks (to weave)...word implies letters weaved together. How could a word ever be out of context? More importantly...who LETS another weave LETTERS into words, while attaching meaning?