Because Cain killed his brother Abel, and when God asked him about it, Cain just straight up lied, and ended up being a fugitive.
Whereas the line where the promise of the Redeemer would come from, was the line of Seth, so this is the line that is focused on in the geneology of Adam, as the Redeemer needs to trace his line all the way back to Adam, which is not done through Cain.
The Holy Scriptures nowhere state that Adam begat Cain, because he is the True satanic/luciferian seedline of the serpent that survived Noah's Great flood, which the wicked masons and all other secret (occult) societies worship today.
We know specifically that as the children of promise, the priesthood passes from Noah to Shem and that Shem is cited in many texts as Melchizedek and the carrier of the priesthood as passed down to him by Adam, Enoch, Lamech, and his father Noah. It is, my opinion, that the reason Ham is nowhere mentioned in chapter 5 of the Book of Jasher, is because he is not a full-blooded brother of Shem and Japhet but a child from a different marriage and mother just as Cain was not a child of Adam’s directly but the offspring of a different father. My question is Ham’s being left out of this account inference that he is Noah’s stepson or implication that he is the offspring of Noah but from a different wife. I believe that as Ishmael was Abraham’s son so was Ham, Noah’s physical progeny but I do question the significance of their relations as well as the nature of their blood ties as there seems to be something peculiar about him as there was with Cain and Ishmael.
Ham showed terrible disrespect to his father just as Satan had disrespect for God. Like Ham, Satan had mated with Eve who was married to Adam. Satan’s son, Cain, like Ham’s son Canaan, was cursed. They were bastards, born out of wedlock and unnatural seeds of pleasure. If Noah’s wife on the ark was Ham’s mother, she could have been like Hagar who gave birth to Abraham’s son, Ishmael, who Scripture denotes was not a child of promise but a child of man’s desire. Hagar, being an Egyptian, had mixed serpent genes that prohibited Ishmael from being a child of promise as he was not pure. Only Sarah, Abraham’s wife, who was of the same flesh as Abraham could give birth to a pure child of promise and is why Isaac received God’s blessing. This explains if Ham’s mother was a descendant of people who had mixed with Cain’s lineage, he would have inherited some of her genes—even though recessive. But, when she and her son, Ham, mated and produced their child, Canaan, he contained more dominant traits of the serpent lineage than of Noah’s pure DNA. Noah was in a drunken state when he was uncovered in his tent. Scripture reveals, “Ham saw the nakedness of his father.” “Wine is a mocker that deceives,” according to Proverbs 20:1.
Serpent DNA Survived the Flood through Adultery God allowed a remnant of the serpent lineage to cross over the flood through Noah’s wife and younger son, Ham. Although Ham was Noah’s son, he was a half-brother to Shem and Japheth who were both brothers with the same mother. This can be determined from Scripture through various words used to describe the brotherly relationship between Shem and Japheth, as Japheth was the elder brother of Shem.
Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born. Genesis 10:21 The Bible does not say the wife of Noah who entered the ark was mother to any of his three sons. But if she was, the only one would have been Ham as he was the youngest according to Genesis 9:24. There is a great possibility Noah’s final wife on the ark had genetic traits from Cain’s lineage because only Noah remained pure in his lineage. Nothing is mentioned about his present wife’s lineage at her point of entering the ark. This may explain Noah having no more children after the flood because of her uncleanness. It also explains what happened when she and Ham devised a way to get Satan’s genetic tree to regenerate in dominant genes among Ham’s lineage by having sex.
Ham committed a terrible atrocity against his father. Even worse, he was proud, boastful, and completely satisfied with his evil. Such behavior was not a trait of Noah but is identical to the traits of Cain. Noah’s wife and their son, Ham, were the two unclean humans brought onto the ark, just like a pair of unclean animals of each kind were allowed on the ark, per Genesis 7:2.
The first so called "NWO Tyrant King" Nimrod was also Ham's grandson btw.
This insight will also connect why Nimrod as descendent of Ham and Canaan’s line, would begin to work again with the fallen ones in attempt to unite the world in first post Atlantean attempt to establish New World Order. Nimrod as the post-flood Babylonian Caesar is also the one that revitalizes and re-institutes the religion of the watchers, incorporating into it human, child, and victim sacrifice as part of their worship ritual.
The Satanic Seedline of Cain - Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet
Genesis 4:1 states that Adam knew his wife, then she conceived, and bare Cain. Bible is clear on the mater, that Adam is the father of Cain.
If secret occult societies worship Cain today, it just show how confused they are.
For a definition of who Satan is:
Matthew 16
But he turned, and said vnto Peter, Get thee behind mee, Satan, thou art an offence vnto me: for thou sauourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
Jesus tells us who Satan is, once Peter rebuked him, then Peter was Satan at that moment. If you do not savourest those things that be of God, but the instead those things that be of men, then you are Satan. So as an example, if the Bible teaches that Adam is the father of Cain, and you say that he is not, then you are Satan at that moment, as it is the teaching of men to claim that Cain is not a child of Adam. Repent of contradicting what the Bible says, like Peter ultimately did, and you are no longer Satan.
Genesis 4
Bible clearly states that Adam is the father of Cain.
Then why is Cain not mentioned at all in the geneology of Adam?
Because Cain killed his brother Abel, and when God asked him about it, Cain just straight up lied, and ended up being a fugitive.
Whereas the line where the promise of the Redeemer would come from, was the line of Seth, so this is the line that is focused on in the geneology of Adam, as the Redeemer needs to trace his line all the way back to Adam, which is not done through Cain.
The Holy Scriptures nowhere state that Adam begat Cain, because he is the True satanic/luciferian seedline of the serpent that survived Noah's Great flood, which the wicked masons and all other secret (occult) societies worship today.
The first so called "NWO Tyrant King" Nimrod was also Ham's grandson btw.
The Satanic Seedline of Cain - Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjKeZK3nq0g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEME1KKQkfg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UiEJcaKdnXCI
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NHDOuNEp84sh
Genesis 4:1 states that Adam knew his wife, then she conceived, and bare Cain. Bible is clear on the mater, that Adam is the father of Cain.
If secret occult societies worship Cain today, it just show how confused they are.
For a definition of who Satan is:
Matthew 16
Jesus tells us who Satan is, once Peter rebuked him, then Peter was Satan at that moment. If you do not savourest those things that be of God, but the instead those things that be of men, then you are Satan. So as an example, if the Bible teaches that Adam is the father of Cain, and you say that he is not, then you are Satan at that moment, as it is the teaching of men to claim that Cain is not a child of Adam. Repent of contradicting what the Bible says, like Peter ultimately did, and you are no longer Satan.