You spent so much energy attacking other users in this thread that you attacked sarcasm as if it were their actual stance.
Yeah! All the people here spreading hate about him daily are just trying to install him as the next dictator!
How does that even work?.I posted several pictures of Trump with Epstein and Maxwell. I don't try to "install" him as the next dictator.Can you elaborate?
The only people I ever see behaving this nonsensically are people whom have been sent specifically to argue. They're the only folks stupid enough to argue against obvious sarcasm and think they're proving anyone wrong.
You are doing exactly what you hate that I am doing.
And
You don't include the full conversation:
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point 23 hours ago +1 / -0
What i'm getting at is that spinning the the negative coverage and unfair treatment of Donald Trump as a backhanded form of endorsement is illogical.
permalink parent save report block reply
–Neo1 [S] 0 points 20 hours ago +1 / -1
How is it illogical?
The "spinning the negative coverage and unfair treatment of Donald Trump" will promote Trump!
I don't understand how are we on the same page, and yet we argue that we have the same point??
permalink parent save report block delete edit reply
–SuicideTruthbomber 2 points 15 hours ago +2 / -0
It seems to me that you are saying that Google and Facebook are deliberately promoting Donald Trump to us in the form of the Streisand effect, which is increasing the public awareness of something as a result of attempts to suppress it. My point is that a handful of users in this forum engage in daily anti-Trump political campainging which keeps his name constantly at the top, and if it's logical that Google and Facebook are acting deliberately to promote him, then the same holds for those users here.
permalink parent save report block reply
–Neo1 [S] 1 point 7 hours ago +1 / -0
Yes, I perfectly agree with this!
So, can we solve it somehow? Perhaps, if I want to post something against Trump, should I add that the others are also criminals? So, if by any chance the post gets popularity, to be perfectly clear that we are against the entire political criminal organization.
Idk just thinking out loud.
Hmmm...
new account
Taking bits and pieces from a convesation to paint me in a bad light
Literally blaming me for arguing, while you are doing the same thing...
Do you have anything more to offer than sacrasm and baseless accusations? You don't. That's why I will block you.
Got tired of government glowies running the conspiracy sub at Reddit.
Decided to come here where pointing you fags out doesn't get people banned
About Neo1:
Every comment of theirs is attacking people in this community. That seems to be their whole reason for being here.
You literally just said:
"Decided to come here where pointing you fags out doesn't get people banned"
You spent so much energy attacking other users in this thread that you attacked sarcasm as if it were their actual stance.
The only people I ever see behaving this nonsensically are people whom have been sent specifically to argue. They're the only folks stupid enough to argue against obvious sarcasm and think they're proving anyone wrong.
And, yeah, paid "disinfo fighters" are fags
You are doing exactly what you hate that I am doing.
And
You don't include the full conversation:
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point 23 hours ago +1 / -0 What i'm getting at is that spinning the the negative coverage and unfair treatment of Donald Trump as a backhanded form of endorsement is illogical.
permalink parent save report block reply –Neo1 [S] 0 points 20 hours ago +1 / -1 How is it illogical?
The "spinning the negative coverage and unfair treatment of Donald Trump" will promote Trump!
I don't understand how are we on the same page, and yet we argue that we have the same point??
permalink parent save report block delete edit reply –SuicideTruthbomber 2 points 15 hours ago +2 / -0 It seems to me that you are saying that Google and Facebook are deliberately promoting Donald Trump to us in the form of the Streisand effect, which is increasing the public awareness of something as a result of attempts to suppress it. My point is that a handful of users in this forum engage in daily anti-Trump political campainging which keeps his name constantly at the top, and if it's logical that Google and Facebook are acting deliberately to promote him, then the same holds for those users here.
permalink parent save report block reply –Neo1 [S] 1 point 7 hours ago +1 / -0 Yes, I perfectly agree with this!
So, can we solve it somehow? Perhaps, if I want to post something against Trump, should I add that the others are also criminals? So, if by any chance the post gets popularity, to be perfectly clear that we are against the entire political criminal organization.
Idk just thinking out loud.
Hmmm...
new account
Taking bits and pieces from a convesation to paint me in a bad light
Literally blaming me for arguing, while you are doing the same thing...
Do you have anything more to offer than sacrasm and baseless accusations? You don't. That's why I will block you.
Yes, please block me.
I don't need to have conversations with someone pretending to be an unhinged conspiracy theorist.
You're a false flag poster smearing shit all over this forum on purpose.