I believe what your referring to is the divine right to rule. During the middle ages kings would have there legal and religious authority given to them by the pope. This is how they were able to say that god mandated there legitimacy to the peasants because the pope spoke for god.
From what iv researched about British history there's seems to be a whole chuck of time added in. Everything before the northman conquest around 1066 is a blur.
I have read that the name Britain comes from the briton people who were named after Brutus of troy. I dont if any of that is real though. the whole united kingdom has a strange history
A little bit of a stretch. More likely every other generation prolly tried to destroy evidence of the old one.
I wonder though, is there any truth to british royals being descended from the kings of bablyon->egypt?
I remember reading one time that the royal family's most prized possessions are not land or gold.
But the pedigree papers that they are descended from the line of god and thus have the right to rule over the rest of us.
I have no idea if this true or not, if it is, its been eradicated off the web.
I believe what your referring to is the divine right to rule. During the middle ages kings would have there legal and religious authority given to them by the pope. This is how they were able to say that god mandated there legitimacy to the peasants because the pope spoke for god.
From what iv researched about British history there's seems to be a whole chuck of time added in. Everything before the northman conquest around 1066 is a blur.
I have read that the name Britain comes from the briton people who were named after Brutus of troy. I dont if any of that is real though. the whole united kingdom has a strange history