Well, you know, it all has to do with "being a good person".
Virtually everyone thinks of themselves as a "good person", then proceeds to do whatever it was they were going to do anyway.
Thinking this through, "being a good person" means "doing a good deed for the right reasons, then expecting for the right reward".
Really thinking this through, though, "being a good person" actually means "doing a good deed even if you know you're going to get kicked in the teeth for your trouble".
Not many people are ready for that. The ironic thing is, if enough people were, I believe there would quickly be a lot less teeth-kicking in the world. It's painful to have to watch it all drag out.
everyone thinks of themselves as a "good person", then proceeds to do whatever it was they were going to do anyway.
Living implies in response to procession...good or bad implies a conflicting response within a conflict of reason (good vs bad). Being (life) processed from inception towards death is neither good or bad...
doing a good deed for the right reasons
Reason implies good vs bad + right vs wrong...a conflict; no matter which side one chooses. A deed/action implies being (life) done (inception towards death) by, hence reacting to.
Reason implies reaction vs reaction, while both sides ignore being enacted upon.
Really thinking this through, though, "being a good person"
How could this thought go through if one holds onto being good? Meanwhile...person aka per sons (by sound) implies sound going through each instrument (structured mind within).
Not many people are ready for that.
a) Does each one wield free will of choice to react to all perceivable? Could it be that others suggest nihilism (not); collectivism (many) and pluralism (people) to distract one from discerning self?
b) What if ready implies RE (reaction) DO (action)? What if being implies reaction (life) within action (inception towards death)?
It's painful to have to watch
How are you watching? Perception (sight) or suggestion (focus)?
FO'CUS, noun - "In optics, a point in which any number of rays of light meet, after being reflected or refracted"
What if point of death is painful to life sentence? What if ones perception gets harmed by focusing on suggestions by another? What if sight narrows by focus? What if focus during motion heats up matter?
If pain (inception towards death) then gain (life)...
Barely anyone exists in the Republic anymore - you have to rebut their fraudulent assumptions in an action on public record to regain your spot in the republic, at which point the corporation’s draft will not apply to you.
Specifically the Republic of the United States?
PDJT: “When this country is gone the rest of the world would follow” https://youtu.be/OGvv2s9vECA
Who are the savior(s) of mankind? more in post/thread/link comment https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1W97GzI/savior-of-mankind-q/
Well, you know, it all has to do with "being a good person".
Virtually everyone thinks of themselves as a "good person", then proceeds to do whatever it was they were going to do anyway.
Thinking this through, "being a good person" means "doing a good deed for the right reasons, then expecting for the right reward".
Really thinking this through, though, "being a good person" actually means "doing a good deed even if you know you're going to get kicked in the teeth for your trouble".
Not many people are ready for that. The ironic thing is, if enough people were, I believe there would quickly be a lot less teeth-kicking in the world. It's painful to have to watch it all drag out.
Doing good is almost never easy.
That’s why real good people are revered and virtue signalers try and co-opt it.
Living implies in response to procession...good or bad implies a conflicting response within a conflict of reason (good vs bad). Being (life) processed from inception towards death is neither good or bad...
Reason implies good vs bad + right vs wrong...a conflict; no matter which side one chooses. A deed/action implies being (life) done (inception towards death) by, hence reacting to.
Reason implies reaction vs reaction, while both sides ignore being enacted upon.
How could this thought go through if one holds onto being good? Meanwhile...person aka per sons (by sound) implies sound going through each instrument (structured mind within).
a) Does each one wield free will of choice to react to all perceivable? Could it be that others suggest nihilism (not); collectivism (many) and pluralism (people) to distract one from discerning self?
b) What if ready implies RE (reaction) DO (action)? What if being implies reaction (life) within action (inception towards death)?
How are you watching? Perception (sight) or suggestion (focus)?
FO'CUS, noun - "In optics, a point in which any number of rays of light meet, after being reflected or refracted"
What if point of death is painful to life sentence? What if ones perception gets harmed by focusing on suggestions by another? What if sight narrows by focus? What if focus during motion heats up matter?
If pain (inception towards death) then gain (life)...
United States of America Corporation**
Barely anyone exists in the Republic anymore - you have to rebut their fraudulent assumptions in an action on public record to regain your spot in the republic, at which point the corporation’s draft will not apply to you.