NATO will build a massive base in Finland
(www.reuters.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
I can help with that.
https://conspiracies.win/p/141ra46FmD/the-february-16th-invasion-that-/c/
https://conspiracies.win/p/141rVRzPoG/head-of-parliamentary-faction-in/c/
https://conspiracies.win/p/141rQpsIC9/if-the-imminent-invasion-farce-i/c/
https://conspiracies.win/p/141rQprkd0/russia-withdraws-troops-from-ukr/c/
https://conspiracies.win/p/141Y9MDQf9/ukraine-president-just-blamed-th/c/
Wow, That was fast.
All five of those posts combined have five comments combined, one of which was the original poster. If it's the Russians, they sure aren't trying very hard.
Is it your view that anything that doesn't support sending money to Ukraine is Russian propaganda?
That were only a few samples from Axo.
Why are you trying to change the topic? We were talking about the massive pro-Russian shilling that used to go on here.
I can provide plenty more or you just search for Russia and Ukraine here yourself.
I am not trying to change the topic. We are talking about Russian shills in this forum. I want to know if you think that political points of view that align with Russia's are likely to originate from Russian shills.
I want to be open in that I believe the forum shills I encounter most often (not here, but in general) are the Clintons/American Independent/Democrats, Deepstate/FBI/Intelligence Community, China and big business. I sometimes see things that I think could be Republican, Russian or North Korean.
The reason I ask is because I myself believe that certain talking points are likely to originate from forum shills. I want to know if you believe the same thing about funding for Ukraine. I am not trying to trap you.
Maybe, maybe not.
You think hat Axo wasn't shilling for Russia?