Bitcoins are produced when the content of the "block" of transactions combined with another number produces a sufficiently small SHA-256 hash value.
I have no idea about the energy independence of this, but his actual words were "energy dominant." I don't know what that means, either, but basically he's betting that BTC will increase in value, thus benefitting America/Americans. In the event of a stratospherically high value increase, that would be a huge win for the US.
A counterargument is that Bitcoin could be disruptive enough that it would undermine or jeopardize American monetary or financial interests (e.g. reserve currency status).
Why do you presume I am voting for this person? I am not claiming to support (Woah! Support, understand, under stand, to stand under. Look, I'm a free choice of word salad!) this guy or what he says.
Thank you for the link to his Truth Social post from five years ago. It looks like he's learned a lot in the past five years. I'm still waiting for his explanation on "energy dominan[ce]." It's probably laughable, but I'm listening.
There is a massive conspiracy to suppress Bitcoin and to eventually make it illegal.
How do you "make" Bitcoin and how is that going to make the USA energy independent?
Bitcoins are produced when the content of the "block" of transactions combined with another number produces a sufficiently small SHA-256 hash value.
I have no idea about the energy independence of this, but his actual words were "energy dominant." I don't know what that means, either, but basically he's betting that BTC will increase in value, thus benefitting America/Americans. In the event of a stratospherically high value increase, that would be a huge win for the US.
A counterargument is that Bitcoin could be disruptive enough that it would undermine or jeopardize American monetary or financial interests (e.g. reserve currency status).
So you have no idea what he means but it is a reason for you to parrot his words and vote for him.
Kek
Why do you presume I am voting for this person? I am not claiming to support (Woah! Support, understand, under stand, to stand under. Look, I'm a free choice of word salad!) this guy or what he says.
Thank you for the link to his Truth Social post from five years ago. It looks like he's learned a lot in the past five years. I'm still waiting for his explanation on "energy dominan[ce]." It's probably laughable, but I'm listening.
It isn't that massive...why does one "bite a coin"? To see if it's real...
"You can tell it's real because it looks so fake" ~ Elon Musk