Threshold issue: A symbol does not automatically convey negative meanings to those who use them innocently to convey valid meanings. The hexagram has a broad history of meanings, including the flags of Australia, Nigeria, and Northern Ireland beyond that of Israel; therefore the issue is not the symbol but its context.
The star does not automatically convey 666 because each triangle is being counted three times due to different aspects. We could just as well argue the hexagon has not only six sides but also six angles, which would make a fourth arbitrary 6.
The argument that natural occurrences of sixes convey the devil's involvement is a glorification of the devil and in fact a permission for him to act more freely. Logically, they are cherry-picked from any number of arbitrary occurrences. The argument that the devil is personally involved in tweaking the radioactive dating of the alleged K-Pg extinction, the selection of English units to set the earth's velocity (which ranges from 65,500 to 67,800 mph) and ecliptic (now 67 degrees), the reported Jewish death toll in WWII, and the arbitrary social distance (which could just as well have been from average human height), attributes dangerous credit to the devil's powers.
I have previously demonstrated that the hexagram was totally unevidenced as relating to Acts 7:43, let alone to Solomon's history, and that the actual star of Remphan had most direct reference to the idolized Nehushtan image instead.
The connection of 666 to the Beast and to Solomon, and the connection of the later hexagram to retconned relationship to Solomon, are arbitrary tie-ins that do not demonstrate intent but only later manipulation. They are cherry-picking as well because they do not similarly connect Adonikam (Ezra 2:13).
The Sumerian cylinder seal shown (VA243) has been demonstrated by Michael Heiser via iconography to depict not Saturn nor the Sun but a generic star in a constellation; in these depictions the number of points is arbitrary.
In the other two images, the hexagram is clearly intended malevolently, but these depictions are not tied to its use in its many other contexts, and in particular have no bearing on its use in Judaism or Zionism.
The fact that Amos and Stephen referring to Nehushtan, and its idolatry by some in the desert wandering who associated it with Saturn, has no special referent different from any other demonic manifestation at any other period of idolatry; the whole world is under the sway of the evil one, so it would be understandable for satanism to have manifested during the wandering, and would not be more significant than any other period.
The reference to the mark of Cain is wholly anachronistic, linguistically unwarranted, and capricious.
Conclusion: The fact that the hexagram can be and has been misused does not warrant its being associated with 666 or other negativity in its every application, and should not encourage the hasty, arbitrary collection and propagation of irrationality.
There is a satanic Jewish infatuation with six that is consistent in their lies. Your arguments all require that we dismiss this evidence as coincidental. "Cohen"cidence.
The bible explains that sixes will be the mark of the beast. If you believe the Bible is the word of God then He meant for this to be a clue and omen to you. Do not dismiss these things as mere coincidence.
I didn't say they were "mere" coincidence, and I complimented you on one where the correlation was strong. Rather, I pointed out not to call conspiracy everything that this people calls conspiracy. Judge everything with more objective, mathematical standards. It doesn't say "sixes", it says six hundred sixty-six.
OP is illogical.
Threshold issue: A symbol does not automatically convey negative meanings to those who use them innocently to convey valid meanings. The hexagram has a broad history of meanings, including the flags of Australia, Nigeria, and Northern Ireland beyond that of Israel; therefore the issue is not the symbol but its context.
The star does not automatically convey 666 because each triangle is being counted three times due to different aspects. We could just as well argue the hexagon has not only six sides but also six angles, which would make a fourth arbitrary 6.
The argument that natural occurrences of sixes convey the devil's involvement is a glorification of the devil and in fact a permission for him to act more freely. Logically, they are cherry-picked from any number of arbitrary occurrences. The argument that the devil is personally involved in tweaking the radioactive dating of the alleged K-Pg extinction, the selection of English units to set the earth's velocity (which ranges from 65,500 to 67,800 mph) and ecliptic (now 67 degrees), the reported Jewish death toll in WWII, and the arbitrary social distance (which could just as well have been from average human height), attributes dangerous credit to the devil's powers.
I have previously demonstrated that the hexagram was totally unevidenced as relating to Acts 7:43, let alone to Solomon's history, and that the actual star of Remphan had most direct reference to the idolized Nehushtan image instead.
The connection of 666 to the Beast and to Solomon, and the connection of the later hexagram to retconned relationship to Solomon, are arbitrary tie-ins that do not demonstrate intent but only later manipulation. They are cherry-picking as well because they do not similarly connect Adonikam (Ezra 2:13).
The Sumerian cylinder seal shown (VA243) has been demonstrated by Michael Heiser via iconography to depict not Saturn nor the Sun but a generic star in a constellation; in these depictions the number of points is arbitrary.
In the other two images, the hexagram is clearly intended malevolently, but these depictions are not tied to its use in its many other contexts, and in particular have no bearing on its use in Judaism or Zionism.
The fact that Amos and Stephen referring to Nehushtan, and its idolatry by some in the desert wandering who associated it with Saturn, has no special referent different from any other demonic manifestation at any other period of idolatry; the whole world is under the sway of the evil one, so it would be understandable for satanism to have manifested during the wandering, and would not be more significant than any other period.
The reference to the mark of Cain is wholly anachronistic, linguistically unwarranted, and capricious.
Conclusion: The fact that the hexagram can be and has been misused does not warrant its being associated with 666 or other negativity in its every application, and should not encourage the hasty, arbitrary collection and propagation of irrationality.
There is a satanic Jewish infatuation with six that is consistent in their lies. Your arguments all require that we dismiss this evidence as coincidental. "Cohen"cidence.
The bible explains that sixes will be the mark of the beast. If you believe the Bible is the word of God then He meant for this to be a clue and omen to you. Do not dismiss these things as mere coincidence.
I didn't say they were "mere" coincidence, and I complimented you on one where the correlation was strong. Rather, I pointed out not to call conspiracy everything that this people calls conspiracy. Judge everything with more objective, mathematical standards. It doesn't say "sixes", it says six hundred sixty-six.