Thinking would require an inner voice. Otherwise they're just reacting.
I'm not convinced people 'with no inner voice' exist. Maybe actual retarded people. It's like the airplane taking off from a treadmill question, people are confused about what's being asked.
Do I hear 'other voices' no, can I think to myself without talking, of course. Everyone does.
I've read enough of those Reddit threads to know they exist. The study was done with prisoners because they were able to find the most in one place. They don't think about how what they do effects others at much higher rates. They also can't think steps ahead.
It cannot be coincidental that someone with no inner monologue has no idea what they're talking about 🤣
Thinking before they speak seems to be impossible too.
Thinking would require an inner voice. Otherwise they're just reacting.
I'm not convinced people 'with no inner voice' exist. Maybe actual retarded people. It's like the airplane taking off from a treadmill question, people are confused about what's being asked.
Do I hear 'other voices' no, can I think to myself without talking, of course. Everyone does.
I've read enough of those Reddit threads to know they exist. The study was done with prisoners because they were able to find the most in one place. They don't think about how what they do effects others at much higher rates. They also can't think steps ahead.
This is why the "people without monologues" is a bullshit psyop.
What if just/iustus/ius/right (inception towards death) generates reactions (life)? What if right implies ones rite of passage?
What if require aka re quaerere implies ones reaction seeking something?
What if ones mind/memory reacts to everything already available?
What if seeking (suggested) tempts one to ignore available (perceivable)?
What convinced you that NO; NOT; NOTHING can exist?
Actual/action implies motion; retardation aka re tardo (delayed response)...what if retardation implies ones delayed response (life) to motion (inception towards death)?