There being less men on the down low infecting women who didn't choose to have sex with someone also having sex with men makes a big difference in the numbers.
Read "Inventing the AIDS Virus" by Dr. Peter Duesberg bcz it explains how once virus hunting became an industry by pharma, the goal was to affix any elevated signs of infection when some one was sick to any conditions for profit.
What happened was artificial drug abuse exploded in the 70's and it led to autoimmune disorders -- virus hunters found that HTLVIII would elevate when they were sick.. so they said "this is the cause" but it wasn't.. it was the result. Our body has countless bacteria and when sick some bacteria become more able to leech on the body -- staph is the best known one.
And that is how they convinced people HIV causes AIDS.
Fast forward to today and you can be "HIV undetectable" and "not transmit HIV" honk
it goes deeper. the actual theory of germs and viruses doesnt validate, not even close. so, anything ever, that starts with accepting viruses are what we've all been told, is null and void. the foundation of the study is underminded. the data may be useful, but the study needs a fresh look, if it involved anything to do with viruses or bacteria.
and until you are learned what i learned, you are not gonna be able to show me a link that will read that assumes viruses are anything but harmless dead cell particles.
It's not about agreeing with your details. Women were given an STD from men they trusted in such high numbers it was a big enough deal to make the news, and cause a study. What happened was an AIDS clinic opened in DC, so all the people that needed treatment moved to the area.
Then the down low men had sex with wife's that didn't consent to having sex with men that had sex with other men. It skewed statistics, but only locally. That's why the study linked is for a specific area.
There being less men on the down low infecting women who didn't choose to have sex with someone also having sex with men makes a big difference in the numbers.
HIV does not cause AIDS
HIV is a catch all ailment.
Read "Inventing the AIDS Virus" by Dr. Peter Duesberg bcz it explains how once virus hunting became an industry by pharma, the goal was to affix any elevated signs of infection when some one was sick to any conditions for profit.
What happened was artificial drug abuse exploded in the 70's and it led to autoimmune disorders -- virus hunters found that HTLVIII would elevate when they were sick.. so they said "this is the cause" but it wasn't.. it was the result. Our body has countless bacteria and when sick some bacteria become more able to leech on the body -- staph is the best known one.
And that is how they convinced people HIV causes AIDS.
Fast forward to today and you can be "HIV undetectable" and "not transmit HIV" honk
That's exactly what happened with SSRI's. They got it backwards for decades.
Whatever the cause, faggotry spreads it.
the numbers are BS
The numbers of women that get infected from men they didn't know were fucking men are high.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150692/
That study was because there was a sudden increase in the area of women not having any sexual activity that would put them at risk.
it goes deeper. the actual theory of germs and viruses doesnt validate, not even close. so, anything ever, that starts with accepting viruses are what we've all been told, is null and void. the foundation of the study is underminded. the data may be useful, but the study needs a fresh look, if it involved anything to do with viruses or bacteria.
and until you are learned what i learned, you are not gonna be able to show me a link that will read that assumes viruses are anything but harmless dead cell particles.
It's not about agreeing with your details. Women were given an STD from men they trusted in such high numbers it was a big enough deal to make the news, and cause a study. What happened was an AIDS clinic opened in DC, so all the people that needed treatment moved to the area.
Then the down low men had sex with wife's that didn't consent to having sex with men that had sex with other men. It skewed statistics, but only locally. That's why the study linked is for a specific area.