Maybe you should take your own advice and read a book or two that goes against what you currently believe. Don't be scared.
I can easily, meaning you can too, determine that the earth cannot be a globe, that it cannot be moving. It means we are on a plane, and that we are stationary. So that means it's not a planet of any shape. No one can prove that the earth is a globe or that earth orbits the sun. In fact, it's easy to disprove.
Does that mean I know what the sun is or how it moves above us? No. Does it mean I know how far the plane stretches? No. Maybe it's infinity. Does rejecting a theory mean I Automatically accept another theory? Think.....no. does it mean I believe we are in a spiritual reality under a fermament created by God? No. And nothing else exists beside these known continents? No. I don't know. No one here does. Anyone claiming to is gullible or foolish. We can use common sense to critically analysis the claim that we are on a globe and determine without question that we are not just by apply your common sense and basic observations. Why you won't even try is a result of your programming.
I reject the common theory because of abvious math and imperial observation. I get meaningful questions, not answers. I refuse to accept easy to cut through deceptions as reality. Like you do .
If I can determine if, and I say, so you can you, then logically, I mean it is demonstratable. Does that mean I'm going to demonstrate it for you? Sure, I could, maybe in person, but to overcome resistance you are likely to subconsciously maintain, no.
And yes, thank you for illustrating that you understand my point. I am disproving a theory, not making one.
The globe is a theory, I disprove it. That is all.
Sure. It's easy. The curve of the earth would stipulate that you cannot see a boat that is 2 meters tall, after it has gone more than a few miles from shore, but with binoculars, you can easily see the entire boat in complete clarity, which should be hidden behind the curve.
There is also the sun, when observed by two people in different times zone at the same time, can easily triangulate the angles from the ground to sun to determine that we cannot be on a globe since the angles make a triangle that calculates the distance of the sun from earth. If it was a globe, the angles would imply the sun must be in two different places. This is not an easy to understand concept by text, but if you are inquisitive and resourceful, then you have a chance.
Furthermore, and there are hundreds of way to disprove the globe, you can look at a cloud overhead and thing about how that cloud could maintain the speed with you on the ground despite being significantantly further from the center of a globe, weigh thousands of pounds, and not having any propulsion. You can look at airports in Alaska and airports on the equator, and consider the difference in speed at which they travel according to the the theory of Earth's rotation and determine that it's impossible for a plane to take off from Alaska at a earth speed that is 3x slower than the runway in Panama.
Also, you couldn't tell me one thing, that proves the earth is a globe. You're not capable of it because it's not round.
You've just never tried to see another perspective. You need to take your own advice
Maybe you should take your own advice and read a book or two that goes against what you currently believe. Don't be scared.
I can easily, meaning you can too, determine that the earth cannot be a globe, that it cannot be moving. It means we are on a plane, and that we are stationary. So that means it's not a planet of any shape. No one can prove that the earth is a globe or that earth orbits the sun. In fact, it's easy to disprove.
Does that mean I know what the sun is or how it moves above us? No. Does it mean I know how far the plane stretches? No. Maybe it's infinity. Does rejecting a theory mean I Automatically accept another theory? Think.....no. does it mean I believe we are in a spiritual reality under a fermament created by God? No. And nothing else exists beside these known continents? No. I don't know. No one here does. Anyone claiming to is gullible or foolish. We can use common sense to critically analysis the claim that we are on a globe and determine without question that we are not just by apply your common sense and basic observations. Why you won't even try is a result of your programming.
I reject the common theory because of abvious math and imperial observation. I get meaningful questions, not answers. I refuse to accept easy to cut through deceptions as reality. Like you do .
So again, take your own advice for once
If I can determine if, and I say, so you can you, then logically, I mean it is demonstratable. Does that mean I'm going to demonstrate it for you? Sure, I could, maybe in person, but to overcome resistance you are likely to subconsciously maintain, no.
And yes, thank you for illustrating that you understand my point. I am disproving a theory, not making one.
The globe is a theory, I disprove it. That is all.
Who was this guy? Username?
Don't remember. Probably works for them. Flat earth is a taboo topic here
Sure. It's easy. The curve of the earth would stipulate that you cannot see a boat that is 2 meters tall, after it has gone more than a few miles from shore, but with binoculars, you can easily see the entire boat in complete clarity, which should be hidden behind the curve.
There is also the sun, when observed by two people in different times zone at the same time, can easily triangulate the angles from the ground to sun to determine that we cannot be on a globe since the angles make a triangle that calculates the distance of the sun from earth. If it was a globe, the angles would imply the sun must be in two different places. This is not an easy to understand concept by text, but if you are inquisitive and resourceful, then you have a chance.
Furthermore, and there are hundreds of way to disprove the globe, you can look at a cloud overhead and thing about how that cloud could maintain the speed with you on the ground despite being significantantly further from the center of a globe, weigh thousands of pounds, and not having any propulsion. You can look at airports in Alaska and airports on the equator, and consider the difference in speed at which they travel according to the the theory of Earth's rotation and determine that it's impossible for a plane to take off from Alaska at a earth speed that is 3x slower than the runway in Panama.
Also, you couldn't tell me one thing, that proves the earth is a globe. You're not capable of it because it's not round.
You've just never tried to see another perspective. You need to take your own advice