Then explain why when they had to replace the EUA authorized rtPCR that they explicitly said it must differentiate between SARS and Influenza A and B?
ILI in CDC data is by way of hospitalization of respiratory disease -- and in February 2020 the CDC stated a higher than average influenza season -- then stopped recording influenza in March 2020 when every thing became CoHoax.
Yes, influenza did not disappear.. it was CoHoax. So was colds, pne, etc.
Influenza-like illness (ILI) is the main indicator used for surveillance of respiratory viruses but RCGP weekly returns service also provide rates for other illnesses such as acute bronchitis, which can be an indicator of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) circulation and pneumonia.
The national influenza surveillance in New Zealand aims at monitoring incidence and distribution of influenza in the community, early detection of influenza epidemics and identifying the predominant circulating strains. The surveillance system includes sentinel general practice (GP) surveillance, laboratory‐based surveillance, hospitalisations and mortality surveillance, and immunisation coverage surveillance.
While "not necessary", the charts do reflect hospitalizations which is used to model totals.. and these hospitalizations are tested, which reflects on why "influenza and pneumonia" were 46% of comorbidities to CoHoax.
The issue is that influenza testing can be achieved and thus why when scaled up testing for CoHoax occurred, influenza results were relabled CoHoax "and".
CoVID does not exist. Ayh also struggle to accept that 5 strains of influenza and several other viral respiratory infections exist as defined.
Ayh know for sure. It was a label. And it was an acknowledged misuse of testing equipment (cycles). There is a reason they renamed SARS-2 to CoVID which was a product line pre-existing (2018g). The very notion "SARS causes CoVID" (which is scientifically absurd) is confirmation that it was a testing conspiracy.
Add to it that ayh my self joined many by also testing the home kits (non PCR) with random objects and returning positive results. In my case an orange and Coke. Ayh posted it on this forum back in 2021g.
Ayh refuse categorically that CoVID existed and exists. There is so many other discrepancies unlike any thing before it. Labs being denied samples or given influenca samples for example. Did SARS2 exist? Perhaps, but if it did it likely followed the same spread model as SARS1 and next to no one experienced it. This was mass hysteria cultivated.
Then explain why when they had to replace the EUA authorized rtPCR that they explicitly said it must differentiate between SARS and Influenza A and B?
ILI in CDC data is by way of hospitalization of respiratory disease -- and in February 2020 the CDC stated a higher than average influenza season -- then stopped recording influenza in March 2020 when every thing became CoHoax.
Yes, influenza did not disappear.. it was CoHoax. So was colds, pne, etc.
I don't need to explain that to demonstate that flu cases are not determined through definitive diagnosis because flu is not a notifiable disease.
Thus the methods used in this process were disrupted by whatever Covid was.
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/how-cdc-estimates.htm
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/sources-of-uk-flu-data-influenza-surveillance-in-the-uk
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634224/
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/diagnosis/overview-testing-methods.htm
While "not necessary", the charts do reflect hospitalizations which is used to model totals.. and these hospitalizations are tested, which reflects on why "influenza and pneumonia" were 46% of comorbidities to CoHoax.
The issue is that influenza testing can be achieved and thus why when scaled up testing for CoHoax occurred, influenza results were relabled CoHoax "and".
CoVID does not exist. Ayh also struggle to accept that 5 strains of influenza and several other viral respiratory infections exist as defined.
Notice the phrase "whatever covid was". Neither of us know for sure.
Ayh know for sure. It was a label. And it was an acknowledged misuse of testing equipment (cycles). There is a reason they renamed SARS-2 to CoVID which was a product line pre-existing (2018g). The very notion "SARS causes CoVID" (which is scientifically absurd) is confirmation that it was a testing conspiracy.
Add to it that ayh my self joined many by also testing the home kits (non PCR) with random objects and returning positive results. In my case an orange and Coke. Ayh posted it on this forum back in 2021g.
Ayh refuse categorically that CoVID existed and exists. There is so many other discrepancies unlike any thing before it. Labs being denied samples or given influenca samples for example. Did SARS2 exist? Perhaps, but if it did it likely followed the same spread model as SARS1 and next to no one experienced it. This was mass hysteria cultivated.