For years I accepted the Khazar theory as true. After it, all it was repeated by some writers who also recognized the leading Jewish role in Communism and their leadership in many other subversive movements.
It was only later, when I considered the question logically and scientifically, were my doubts about the Khazar theory aroused. One thing that I did not know then was that Koestler, the communist Jew who popularized the Khazar Theory bragged in a Jewish magazine that he advanced the theory as way to fight against anti-Semitism. His theory was that since the Gospels and Europeans blamed Jews for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, if he could make Europeans believe that they are not related by blood to the Christkiller Jews talked about in the New Testament that he could lessen hatred against Jews. One must remember until the Jewish triumph of “Christian Zionism” 99 percent of Christianity viewed Jews as the greatest enemies of Jesus Christ and God, as the New Testament makes very, very clear. So in those days some Jews, such as Koestler saw an advantage to say that the Jews were not actually related to the Jews who crucified Christ and so persecuted Christians.
It's probably time to debate this here again in a dedicated thread
The khazarian origin of ashkenazi jews theory came from the 19th century. Koestler may have found it useful for the purpose you mention but that doesn't invalidate the theory.
It's a historical fact the Khazar khaganate (modern day Ukraine) converted to judaism around 8th c. starting with Khan Bulan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulan_(Khazar) and were a jewish state until the russians came and destroyed them (history rhymes apparently).
Interesting. Yes, I would like to learn more about this. Someone who considers themself knowledgeable of this subject please make a separate post with deep dive into the subject.
For all the folks who claim Arthur Koestler invented the Khazar theory this is proof he didnt. Koestler wrote his book so others could simply say "A zionist invented this theory". The truth is there are even more books out there than this one on the Khazars and you could check with the Vatican library or just google Leo the Khazar. The people who dont believe there were Khazars obviously do not want to know their history either, usually the same people who dont want to know the history of the House of Judah or the Israelites (all 12 tribes) that James the apostle for one addressed his epistle to.
One has to ask why the Arabic looking Jews look different from the European type Jews and I am here to tell you it is not because of geography it is because of biology.
Dunlop does a fantastic job recreating the age old Pagan nomad Empire caught in the center of a religious struggle between Christiandom and the Islamic expanisionist Caliphate. A debate was held between by the Khazar Khagan between a Christian Bishop sent from Byzantium, his Jewish advisor and an Islamic Imam resulting in a third power, a Jewish one. Dunlop presents a well documented work which takes into consideration all documentation Christian, Jewish and Islamic Historical resources in his review. Dunlop uses scholorly advisors to assertain which information is more of fact and which is fabrication for political purposes. It is a very interesting read which dispells much of the myths of Eastern European Jewish history as well is the most accurate presentation on this specific topic. Arthur Kostler in his lesser work "The Thirteenth Tribe" uses Dunlops work in mass referance although it falls short when compared to "The History of the Jewish Khazars" by taking a leap and realying on information deemed inaccurate according to Dunlop and his advisors. Other then that a recommeded read far superior and more indepth then that of Kostler's effort.
I don't believe they are all of Edom. None of them are of Jacob. Does it really matter further about the 90%. They are treated like dirt in Israeli. By the way, the official name of the state, Israeli, means "not Israel".
Jews as the greatest enemies of Jesus Christ and God, as the New Testament makes very, very clear.
It doesn't.
It doesn't say that, AT ALL.
It does talk about religious Jew leaders, their righteousness, and lack thereof. He specifically separates Jews who seek to kill Him from other Jews who did not.
You're all wet behind the ears, not being familiar with the Word of God, but only those modern teachers your itching ears prefer.
1 Thessalonians 2:14 14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: 16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.
Jews killed Jesus and their own prophets. Impale them!!!!
Matthew 12:14 Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him.
Jew pharisees plotted to destroy Jesus.
The modern Jew frauds in Israel today resemble the behavior of the scheming Pharisees.
Matthew 26:4 And consulted that they (Jews) might take Jesus by subtilty, and kill him.
Some claim the khazar theory has been debunked.
David duke once believed in it but later abandoned it.
https://davidduke.com/rethinking-khazar-theory/
It's probably time to debate this here again in a dedicated thread
The khazarian origin of ashkenazi jews theory came from the 19th century. Koestler may have found it useful for the purpose you mention but that doesn't invalidate the theory.
It's a historical fact the Khazar khaganate (modern day Ukraine) converted to judaism around 8th c. starting with Khan Bulan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulan_(Khazar) and were a jewish state until the russians came and destroyed them (history rhymes apparently).
We'll need a separate thread for that indeed.
Interesting. Yes, I would like to learn more about this. Someone who considers themself knowledgeable of this subject please make a separate post with deep dive into the subject.
This book is the most definitive mainstream historical research on the subject: https://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/dunlop-d.-m.-the-history-of-the-jewish-khazars/Dunlop%20D.M.%20-%20The%20History%20of%20the%20Jewish%20Khazars.pdf
Here's what one guy wrote about it:
I'll read it and make a thread eventually.
I don't believe they are all of Edom. None of them are of Jacob. Does it really matter further about the 90%. They are treated like dirt in Israeli. By the way, the official name of the state, Israeli, means "not Israel".
It doesn't.
It doesn't say that, AT ALL.
It does talk about religious Jew leaders, their righteousness, and lack thereof. He specifically separates Jews who seek to kill Him from other Jews who did not.
You're all wet behind the ears, not being familiar with the Word of God, but only those modern teachers your itching ears prefer.
Jews killed Jesus and their own prophets. Impale them!!!!
Jew pharisees plotted to destroy Jesus.
The modern Jew frauds in Israel today resemble the behavior of the scheming Pharisees.