I wonder which one of these are most likely to sexually abuse kids (under 12 y/o). Historically it must be the regular homosexuals as they were the only ones to have convenient access as teachers / foster guardians. But nowadays with brazen "pride", it could be worthy to study and wake up some normies if the full blown crazies are also diddlers. And that is real diddlers, not like those epstein/diddy with 16 y/o whores.
I think general consensus is that while a high % of homosexuals were abused as kids, most of them don't continue the trend. (But obviously the few that do, were nearly all abused as kid). And I mean physical abuse, not just shown porn books / drag story hour (which, while disturbing, normies don't care about unfortunately).
I wonder which one of these are most likely to sexually abuse kids (under 12 y/o). Historically it must be the regular homosexuals as they were the only ones to have convenient access as teachers / foster guardians. But nowadays with brazen "pride", it could be worthy to study and wake up some normies if the full blown crazies are also diddlers. And that is real diddlers, not like those epstein/diddy with 16 y/o whores.
I think general consensus is that while a high % of homosexuals were abused as kids, most of them don't continue the trend. (But obviously the few that do, were nearly all abused as kid). And I mean physical abuse, not just shown porn books / drag story hour (which, while disturbing, normies don't care about unfortunately).