Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
In 1969g the Apollo program claimed to have placed laser reflectors on the lunar surface. These 2'x2'(ish) reflectors were on angle, which diminishes area for 99.9% of the cycle. They claimed pin point accuracy and readings from Earth in 1969g. (-_-) Note: they are launching "replacements" this year (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by pkvi_halfkdeltaxsq 1 year ago by pkvi_halfkdeltaxsq +8 / -4
17 comments share
17 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– pkvi_halfkdeltaxsq [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Only under remarkable precision, intermittent, inconsistent, for such a fractional amount of time (prism) that you can not confidently claim we had the sort of technological capabilities when created in 67 to 70

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DZP1 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Your comment is kind of ungrammatical, and you may not understand any physics. So I am not clear on what the fuck you're saying.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pkvi_halfkdeltaxsq [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

is kind of ungrammatical

/face palm/

Considering physics in the context of what is being argued has a larger % of unknown variables, aym confident you are far too over confident, in your understanding of physics.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DZP1 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'll be blunt: you're an idiot. Richard Feynman was my physics professor. I'll take you on any day of the week.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pkvi_halfkdeltaxsq [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Deal.

Feynman was a joke. Being passionate about a position in physics is not replaceable for replicable consistency. Feynman like many over hyped of his time have failed the fundamentals of tangible proof and the consequence has been adding more to simplicity, the now dogmatic antithetical religion of modern physics.

Where do you want to being? -- bcz it will be a harsh upending of your entire belief system --> for example STANDARD MODEL IS WRONG AND PARTICLE WAVE DUALITY IS FOR IDIOTS who fail to understand that the field defines the mechanisms, not your idiotic "you can not find a particle in any given position so we'll infer as a moment of a wave".

All it would take is for the entire indoctrinated model to be inverted and suddenly you people would realize how it all makes so much more sense. The "industry" of physics is your people bragging about regurgitation from previously or eventually-failed models.

Let's go..

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy