? The data is available that there no users on Truth. You must know this to be true. Themselves claim only 2 million users but only less than half active.
The valuation is fact at 8B$
So where is the opinion that there is some thing corrupt about this?
I agree there probably around a million active users, so I have heard.
The point I was making was the guy in the video makes a lot of assumptions, such as assuming many of the users of the site are also financially invested in it. I feel like this is a big leap. He makes other assumptions in the video I find suspect also, without providing anything to back up those assumptions, therefore my remark "no data".
Ayh think it is fair to suggest that any one who invested and maintained that investment after the first spike in value of DWST are more than likely users. The rest are corrupt investor in the laundering mechanism.
Too many assumptions with no data to back it. Just opinion.
? The data is available that there no users on Truth. You must know this to be true. Themselves claim only 2 million users but only less than half active.
The valuation is fact at 8B$
So where is the opinion that there is some thing corrupt about this?
I agree there probably around a million active users, so I have heard.
The point I was making was the guy in the video makes a lot of assumptions, such as assuming many of the users of the site are also financially invested in it. I feel like this is a big leap. He makes other assumptions in the video I find suspect also, without providing anything to back up those assumptions, therefore my remark "no data".
Ayh think it is fair to suggest that any one who invested and maintained that investment after the first spike in value of DWST are more than likely users. The rest are corrupt investor in the laundering mechanism.