Chris Knowles, for all his knowledge of symbology, appears to have skipped over an important interpretation in the numerology of this event.

He identifies that the destruction was just after the bridge's 47th birthday, and then loosely attributes that to some association with Freemasons and Euclid's 47th Proposition.

This strikes me as needlessly esoteric, given a much more recent and frequently used "signature". That is, the National Security Act was passed in 1947, giving the US and the rest of the world the global Gitmo Nation in which we live today. It was Year One of the modern CIA, responsible for so many of these "events". They love to sign their work and, once alerted to this, you will find "47" occurring with astonishing frequency.

The question arises: can Chris Knowles, with all his recognition of symbolism and apparent depth of knowledge, really be unaware of this notation of "47", or consider it unimportant to mention in this context? I leave it to everyone to decide for themselves whether that reasonably may be the case.