Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

2
Why does no one want to admit that feminists were behind raising the age of consent in the USA and other parts of the world. The age of consent used to be 10 or 12 depending on the state. Now it has been raised to 16-18 depending on the state.
posted 1 year ago by mahapatraisanhero 1 year ago by mahapatraisanhero +5 / -7
23 comments share
23 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– MGTOWInformant 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I can't say for sure about the age of consent being 10-12, but I'm pretty sure the minimum age for marriage was 14( look up Bouvier's Law Dictionary of 1856 and look under the word 'marriage'. So imo it got raised from 14 to 18, but everyone abided by the common law until they infiltrated the government. So if you had sex with a virgin, you were bound to marry her if the parents found out or she wanted to get married.

They implemented all these changes with the women to destabilize society and they got all sorts of economic benefits: double taxation, free sex from prime-aged women, they get to steal money from men now from all the welfare scams, etc

But another thing is that the legislative branch, both state or federal cannot legislative for the age of consent, because both state and federal constitutions strictly prohibit the government from impairing the obligation of contracts. Therefore, you're supposed to go bo the common law. The reason why they keep on with this scam acting like they have the power is because it's too good of a business and nobody knows how to argue in court.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy