So easy that you’re physically incapable of explaining how the angular diameter of an object can become negative without it moving below the visible plane.
Oh, so “seeing in a line”? A line that can’t stop being seen unless it’s interrupted by something? Something like the ground? The ground under which the sun “never” moves? Because otherwise you could never not see the sun, but you, the flat earther, say you can always see the sun. But the sun can’t be seen at night.
optically
THE ANGULAR DIAMETER OF AN OBJECT CAN NEVER BE NEGATIVE.
And yet, on a flat earth, there is no explanation for why the sun falls below the horizon.
Actually, it's totally easy as fuck to understand
So easy that you’re physically incapable of explaining how the angular diameter of an object can become negative without it moving below the visible plane.
So fucking easy. Anyone who can't just figure it out for themselves is inept. Like u
Translation: I can’t prove any of my claims.
It's linear perspective. Sun is calculated to be about 4k miles up, and about 30 miles wide.
The object, the sun, behaves exactly like youd expect. Optically, it's low on horizon the farther you are away.
See, how easy
Oh, so “seeing in a line”? A line that can’t stop being seen unless it’s interrupted by something? Something like the ground? The ground under which the sun “never” moves? Because otherwise you could never not see the sun, but you, the flat earther, say you can always see the sun. But the sun can’t be seen at night.
THE ANGULAR DIAMETER OF AN OBJECT CAN NEVER BE NEGATIVE.
NO MATTER HOW FAR AWAY IT IS.
Yet difficult to explain?
If youre not genuinely trying to understand, ya. And if that were the case, you'd be looking on flatearth101.com or something.
Anyone with genuine inquisitive Nature can figure out for themselves, definitively.
If you don't believe that, I say, don't shoot the messenger. Go verify for yourself
It’s a shame you don’t know yourself then