Our ruling class is still pagan
(www.eddiocracy.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
You can chill out dude. Happy to talk to you if you got some points or something we should look at.
If you've really done your digging, you know learning this stuff takes time.
When you say the original texts, lemme know what you're talking about.
"I have given them dozens of times on this forum. You don't read, You never read. You just remain in your ignorance. In your nice and safe "Christian" bubble."
Lol. Is that where you think I've been? Funny, all this time I was under the impression I'd been against Christianity for the last 15 years.
Looks at all the good read books... which aren't original sources.
Yea... It's me... I'm the religious one...
Good talk.
Latin textus (woven) implies uniting anything flexible together; hence reducing flexibility. Meanwhile...origin (inception towards death) generates flexibility (life).
"Because it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He1TntAK2fs
a) Towards (to) implies a single source (motion), hence each life within being moved from inception towards death.
b) That which sets apart is the source of weaving together (text).
c) Notice that religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies binding together, and that before religion, there was mystic/mist/misceo (to mix).
Before anything can be mixed and bound together; it has to be set apart, hence being implies one apart from one another.
Knowledge implies everything perceivable by each one within...others suggest nothing (don't) as the inversion thereof. This implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting consensual de-nial of perceivable.