Incorrect. Slavic neopagan symbol on the right were never on the german flag.
Swastika was.
And to add more interesting things as Slav I would say:
Slavic old pagan religion were almost completely eradicated by Christianity. Almost all gone, most of myths NOT preserved. Why ? Well in case of Poland and germanized Polabians the case is GENOCIDE. Supported by Church and done by GERMANIC states. In case of Russian states it is Vikings and Christianization. Much more were preserved in Russia - but not so much. And mixed with uralic religions so it doesn't make too much sense.Almost no historical records. Small exceptions not sure to be true or fake.
Slavs are by most western (Germanic) historians claimed to be some worse stupid primitive tribes. This historical propaganda were "justification" to conquer us.
But there is genetics.Slavic Paterlinear is haglogroup R1a1, more Germanic one is R1b What do you see here ? https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/r1a1a-conquers-the-worldin-a-few-pulses
Boom. So who were ancient Aryans ? Were they ancestors to Iranians,Slavs and upper Castes of India ? Indian Vedic language isn't even a bit similar to Slavic ?
For example "Weda" sounds familiar to "Wiedza". in english: KNOWLEDGE
And Svastika (and even more slavic Kolovrat) is "solar" symbol. Have I mention all intriguing things about universe somehow "mixed into" hindu religion ?
Slavic nations are currently extremely divided,but more than 1000 ago Slavs were almost the same. No bigger differences than amongst Scandinavians. Language barriers ? Biggest within 3 language groups: western,eastern, and southern but still it isn't so different like French vs English. or English vs German. What records survived from time before Christianization ? In practice : none. Isn't that strange ?
3.And now we go to Germans. They claimed "Aryans" are their ancestors ? Strange.
Their haglogroup is mostly R1b (except for Polabians - those who were Germanized and survived). Is R1b existing in India/Tibet and Iran ? So how do you call it in USA - "cultural appropriation" ? Of course svastika were symbol used also among germanic tribes. Right. But they stole "Aryans".
But there is more sinister thing here. German nazis were in fact ruled by the same very jews they claimed to destroy. They smeared using symbols like svastika and Aryan people. For what reason ?
And if Holocaust were exagerated and if we look at communism, next we look at Ukraine and the fact they want Poland and other countries join the war with Russia - there is a pattern here. Pattern of Cultural and genetic Genocide.
Ah yes. And here we go with the truth about germanic and slavic people.
Both groups had common genesis.
And what is also important about old good English: Vikings.Old Norse influence probably.
Mindblowing thing: not all Vikings were Germanic Scandinavians in fact some Vikings had in part Slavic roots. And not,I am NOT talking about the mother of Knut the Great. I am talking about recruits from Pomerania (southern Baltic see region).
Again - there are some genetic proofs for that too,but I don't remember links.
Nordic Vikings and Slavs were best frenemies it seems ;)
Weda" sounds familiar to "Wiedza". in english: KNOWLEDGE
Knowledge implies perceivable...others utilize suggested (word) to distract from perceivable (sound).
Sound sets itself apart...from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perception). Others suggest the inversion thereof as coming together aka "to familiarize" aka "we are family; brothers and my sisters and me". Those who consent to be part of a family ignore being partial within whole.
From a different perspective...sound implies same; each instrument within implies difference. Others suggest words sounding alike/familiar to distract different instruments from same origin of sound.
Only within perceivable sound can suggestible words be shaped, and ones consent to another ones suggestion implies a putting together (fiction) of what nature sets apart (reality).
Trying to reverse engineer suggested languages to their origin; tempts one to ignore the ongoing sound underneath each temporary word shaped. Try humming continuously; while shaping letters until you realize the fiction of letters. Notice that you run out of breath while humming; and that you're forced to inhale aka to let in the ongoing natural order, which you then resist by exhaling. This force implies the origin of sound; not the words shaped within to describe it.
It's called "letter"; because ones consent "lets" another one shape natural sound into articulated words.
there's a pattern here
a) Pattern implies outline; being implies within (life) line (inception towards death). Focusing one suggested outline tempts one to ignore being inline.
b) Pattern as "a part showing the figure or quality of the whole" tempts one to ignore being partial (perception) within whole (perceivable); while permitting others to show (suggestion) fictitious qualities.
ha-plo-group
Aka one folded together...being implies ones (partials) set apart from one another within whole.
Graffiti on a ruined Russian tank.
What's the issue exactly?
Who is that guy anyway?
The issue is that slavic neopagan symbols look vaguely like german nationalist socialist flag from the early 40s.
Incorrect. Slavic neopagan symbol on the right were never on the german flag. Swastika was.
And to add more interesting things as Slav I would say:
Slavic nations are currently extremely divided,but more than 1000 ago Slavs were almost the same. No bigger differences than amongst Scandinavians. Language barriers ? Biggest within 3 language groups: western,eastern, and southern but still it isn't so different like French vs English. or English vs German. What records survived from time before Christianization ? In practice : none. Isn't that strange ?
3.And now we go to Germans. They claimed "Aryans" are their ancestors ? Strange. Their haglogroup is mostly R1b (except for Polabians - those who were Germanized and survived). Is R1b existing in India/Tibet and Iran ? So how do you call it in USA - "cultural appropriation" ? Of course svastika were symbol used also among germanic tribes. Right. But they stole "Aryans".
But there is more sinister thing here. German nazis were in fact ruled by the same very jews they claimed to destroy. They smeared using symbols like svastika and Aryan people. For what reason ?
Khazaria.Sviatoslav Rurikovich destroyed Khazaria.
And if Holocaust were exagerated and if we look at communism, next we look at Ukraine and the fact they want Poland and other countries join the war with Russia - there is a pattern here. Pattern of Cultural and genetic Genocide.
No, no.Even more. Look:In English WISDOM. pronounced wezd'm
Ah yes. And here we go with the truth about germanic and slavic people. Both groups had common genesis.
And what is also important about old good English: Vikings.Old Norse influence probably.
Mindblowing thing: not all Vikings were Germanic Scandinavians in fact some Vikings had in part Slavic roots. And not,I am NOT talking about the mother of Knut the Great. I am talking about recruits from Pomerania (southern Baltic see region). Again - there are some genetic proofs for that too,but I don't remember links.
Nordic Vikings and Slavs were best frenemies it seems ;)
Knowledge implies perceivable...others utilize suggested (word) to distract from perceivable (sound).
Sound sets itself apart...from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perception). Others suggest the inversion thereof as coming together aka "to familiarize" aka "we are family; brothers and my sisters and me". Those who consent to be part of a family ignore being partial within whole.
From a different perspective...sound implies same; each instrument within implies difference. Others suggest words sounding alike/familiar to distract different instruments from same origin of sound.
Only within perceivable sound can suggestible words be shaped, and ones consent to another ones suggestion implies a putting together (fiction) of what nature sets apart (reality).
Trying to reverse engineer suggested languages to their origin; tempts one to ignore the ongoing sound underneath each temporary word shaped. Try humming continuously; while shaping letters until you realize the fiction of letters. Notice that you run out of breath while humming; and that you're forced to inhale aka to let in the ongoing natural order, which you then resist by exhaling. This force implies the origin of sound; not the words shaped within to describe it.
It's called "letter"; because ones consent "lets" another one shape natural sound into articulated words.
a) Pattern implies outline; being implies within (life) line (inception towards death). Focusing one suggested outline tempts one to ignore being inline.
b) Pattern as "a part showing the figure or quality of the whole" tempts one to ignore being partial (perception) within whole (perceivable); while permitting others to show (suggestion) fictitious qualities.
Aka one folded together...being implies ones (partials) set apart from one another within whole.
tl; dr...FAMILIAR; adjective - "the slaves"...there's your slavic connection. https://www.etymonline.com/word/familiar#etymonline_v_1106
Fuck off you jewish bot.
Slavs real root is from Słowo (the Word) or Slava (the Glory), not from "slave".