TL;DR: This is another wandering tour that highlights a few leaves on the tree of one of the handful of Families that have run America since long before its inception. What brings up here today is this news item:
San Francisco Macy’s to close in devastating blow to downtown (SF Chronicle 2/27/2024)
Many will have seen this news and simply thought, “Another bump on the side of the hill down which progressives have kicked the once beautiful city of San Francisco,” or “The Doom Spiral!” or some similar thought. As always, “They” are content with you thinking whatever first comes to mind, but fear you ever looking deeper. That’s what we’ll do here.
You see, the connections to this event stretch all the way back to the mid-1600’s, when (we are told) whitey first showed up in North America to begin the program of bigotry and oppression that has lead us to Donald J. Trump (or whatever we’re supposed to believe).
If you are very old indeed, you may have heard the department store called by the original name “R.H. Macy & Co.”. That refers to the founder, Rowland Hussey Macy , originally of Nantucket. Any time you see that island mentioned, pay close attention. I did.
Wiki won’t tell you this on R.H. Macy’s page, but I will: one of the original group of Nantucket settlers in the mid-17th Century was Thomas Macy. Given the tiny population of that tiny island, I think we can say without genealogical research that R.H. is clearly one of his descendants. Is there anyone else? Sure, but we’ll start slow and build up.
As you were reading this post, did you think of beloved character actor and “Varsity Blues” briber William H. Macy? If so, and you just clicked that hotlink to check your guess to confirm that he’s descended from Thomas of Nantucket, you’ll be disappointed. But fear not, I will confirm it for you here, courtesy of EthniCelebs. You don’t think leaving that out of Wiki was on purpose, do you?
Everyone likes to talk about “the Joos” and—again—I will not disappoint. A few may have been aware that Otto Frank, fiction writer and father of the renowned diarist, tried to immigrate to the US before the war by writing for the help of an influential American friend. He knew that friend from his time decades previously working in—you got it—Macy’s Department Store in Jew York City. That friend was Nathan Straus Jr., son of the owner of Macy’s. Nathan married Helen Sachs, and that made his father-in-law the neurologist Bernard Sachs. If that immediately made you think, “Haha, Sachs as in Goldman–Sachs?”, click the link to see how correct you are.
I won’t go into it here, but it’s well worth looking up Nathan Jr’s son, R. Peter Straus. You’ll find direct links to: Edward Bernays, the Sulzbergers and the Jew York Times, USAID, VOA, and (tell me you saw this coming) Monica Lewinsky. You can’t make this stuff up. He married her mom while the scandal was ongoing. (And as you might now be guessing, The Monica Lewinsky Scandal was Faked (25-page PDF)).
However, you might at this point also be thinking, “We’re wandering off the track a bit, aren’t we?” Kinda, but the whole point is to illustrate that wandering off the track even slightly--but in the correct direction--leads you even deeper into the weeds because it’s a Very… Small… Club.
Back on the main line but two and a half centuries ago, we can take a look at this old clipping:
Nantucket Newspapers and My Parker Ancestors
Much more to be said about these Parkers at a later date (again, see how it works?), but for now you may note that Isaac Parker was involved in some sort of commercial venture with Peleg Macy, Jr. on Nantucket. Turns out Isaac was the son of Captain John Parker. He commanded the colonial militia at the Battle of Lexington on April 19, 1776. (Waco massacre and almost Hitler’s birthday, right? Coincidence? Think that battle might have been a false flag of sorts?)
Somehow I never knew his name before this, but as I reflect on that, I take it as suggesting that there’s not so much a formal Memory Hole that we could locate and destroy, but a subtle smearing and slow wiping away of history from consciousness. Effective, is it not?
Finally, another Macy along the chain was Josiah Macy Jr.: Nantucket, Standard Oil, Rockefellers, and setting up Albert Einstein’s handler. The drill gets boring after a while, doesn’t it? Well, I wanted to end with a bang and I’ll give it to you: his foundation set up what are known as the Macy conferences. Never heard of them? Of course not. Wiki doesn’t even link to them from Josiah’s page, the devious bastards!
You can chase down some documentation on them in this link I saved:
Cybernetics. The Macy Conferences 1946-53. Technocratic planning for the Internet and the Merger of Man/Machine. (r/conspiracy 1/13/2021)
I will tell you about their importance, though, something no one is talking about and and an insight I came to only very recently. We’ve all heard of Technocracy and we’ve all heard of Transhumanism, probably too much and most of it pointless. You can actually see the insight I had in the title of that post: it is cybernetics that is the fusion of technocracy and transhumanism and is the level beyond them both. Wiki feeds you a lot of nonsense and hand-waving on their cybernetics page, but I link only for completeness and not because you should study it.
Really, the only item of importance on the page is the etymology of the word itself, and it is revelatory. The word “cybernetics” comes from the Greek and means “helmsperson”. “They” mean to steer human society as one steers a ship, you see. To accomplish that, humans must become parts of that ship, to become machine-like, as reliable and predictable as any inanimate part. (I digress here to add that the word “robot” comes from a word meaning “slave”, so you should observe the concepts have always coalesced.) Indeed, if one observes the operation of a sailing vessel, the members of the crew behave as machines. There is no creativity, only execution.
So we got from a department store closing to The System of the World. Not bad, right?
Bonus for everyone that stuck it out this far: did you ever actually take conscious notice of the logo of Macy’s? Now that I alert you to it consciously, have you ever seen such a symbol used anywhere else? You can believe it indeed has broader (dare I say “occult”?) meaning, or is merely coincidence, or you may prefer to accept this preposterous story on it’s face:
Macy’s famous red star has Nantucket roots (Boston.com 9/23/2017)
Guess I'll need to chime in here too. See my unintentional mention of Einstein without realizing he'd been brought up above.
Since we're running on gut feeling, I'll suggest that Walther Mayer was not originally a "handler", as he was positioned by Richard von Mises, brother of Ludwig. After that the Macy trust took interest and funneled money to Mayer, so it's possible he may have graduated to the role of "handler". And at the same time, Einstein's study turned, from Mises's requested topic of teleparallelism, to refinement of general relativity. We are told that teleparallelism failed to have a Schwarzschild solution (don't confuse black and red there!) but that it was later determined to work with gravity but not electromagnetism.
Well, due to the thesis I laid out in the first link above, electromagnetism has been sidelined by Bohr's quantum revolution, and that's what makes it currently appear irreconcilable with gravity. Thus the conspiracy theory would be that teleparallelism does actually contain the seeds of understanding action-at-a-distance (often called FTL) and that Einstein was gradually pulled away from it so as to hide the "forbidden knowledge", which was then redirected to other scientists so that it could be published in warped fashion to make it appear consistent with nascent quantum theory.
If I were writing for a mainstream science pub, it would be easy to spin this into a series of sci-fi articles that pass editorial muster and sound like vague promises of power; but the reality is that all power flows from God and is free, without any arcana necessary. So regard my pontification as bluster. Teleparallelism relies upon tetrad (4D) field definition that relates distant observed effects. The path forward would then be to regard curvature and torsion as "the same thing" (two effects of the same phenomenon) and to consider what spacetime models (and standard-model alternatives) would explain action at a distance, which would then be electromagnetic teleparallelism. This is necessary because quantum theory still doesn't describe accurately how entangled particles appear to have FTL connection, which was exactly the point of the 1935 EPR paradox, which is exactly what Einstein was shuttled into studying in the period of interest. And we know the demons are excessively interested in how light modification upon the stars they control might affect our planet at a distance, so the topic is more than academic but relates to spiritual warfare.
Overall, the work of persuading Einstein that teleparallelism was fruitless and redirecting his objections to Bohr into the more palatable EPR challenge might be perceived as the influence of the Macy Foundation, but other factors were also present, and it seems to me that the Macy Foundation picked up slack after a prior attempt to influence Einstein via his friend Emil Warburg (who was indeed of the Warburg banking family as per the first link).