WARNING: This post ended up much longer than I expected. It will be long and boring to almost everyone, about an event from long ago that has little direct relevance to any current events. But if you have the slightest interest, you’ll read some things I have not ever seen noted anywhere else and I think you will find you “didn’t expect all this”. I sure didn’t. Also, I’ll end with a comment as to why it may have been a crucial failure for TPTB.
Why write all this? I have this strange compulsion to speak truths out into the Universe. Maybe that’s because I just like being contrary to TPTB, who control history by speaking lies into the Universe longer than anyone else can speak the truth. Yes, it’s a drop in the ocean of the fight against them, but the ocean is made of drops, is it not? If you’re still here, let’s begin….
For the vast majority of the population, the attempted assassination of President Reagan is not even a blip on the radar, even though it is well within living memory. The normies that are aware of it know the story as, “John Hinckley Jr. shoots Reagan to impress Jodie Foster”. Note that this is a reinforcement to the “lone nut with a gun” meme, not even twenty years after they gave us the first telling of that tale.
We were also introduced to the novel meme of “deranged stalker”, and “They” have gotten a lot of mileage from that, have They not? Take a look at this: Erotomania: Well-known cases. This “disorder” barely exists outside of Hinckley. But then again, Wiki says the DSM-5 says it’s real, so it’s real.
Alternatively, conspiracy theorists know the story as, “son of Bush crony tries to kill Reagan so Bush can become President”. Yes, that’s certainly true and that’s where the theorists stop. I’ve been satisfied with that explanation myself for many years, but I never really thought it through. Here’s the part in the story that separates conspiracy theorists from truth-seekers: when you kick over a rock, truth-seekers must be prepared to throw out what they thought before and take a look at new findings. Okay, last chance to turn back….
The mainstream takes pains to tell us that Hinckley shot Reagan with a Röhm RG-14, “known as a Saturday night special, a general category of cheap, low quality handguns”. JHJR did not bring much of a gun for this job, did he? Really, it’s about as low-rent as you can go and have a normal person even consider it a “gun” (unless that person is a Democrat, but then again I did say “normal”).
What can you do with that kind of firepower? It’s terrifying! Shooting six rounds of .22LR from a snubnose revolver in a chaotic situation, Hinckley confirmed two near fatalities and two complete incapacitations. Wow! He would kick Wick’s dick in, would he not? Super Soldier Hinckley, reporting for duty!
Wellllll… I do not believe it. Not in the slightest.
Everybody knows about Reagan and Hinckley, but go back and look at footage of the other two “victims”. They are face down on the sidewalk, completely motionless. No blood, of course, but not clutching at wounds or moaning or writhing or swearing profusely about being shot. Complete incapacitation through a mechanism no one seems to have ever wondered about.
Is 22 Long Rifle God’s own caliber? No. It can certainly be fatal in exactly the correct circumstances, but here’s something for comparison: a story about a guy who accidentally shot himself with a .25 ACP (something everyone would consider more powerful) and he did not realize it until he had some knee pain, went to the ER, and doctors dug out a bullet:
The Wound Report: Always Bring Enough Gun (TTAG 2/8/2024)
Okay then, what really happened on March 30, 1981 outside the Washington Hilton?
It’s a longer story I’ll have to post separately about, but (1) there’s more to the Hinckleys than you think, and (2) it looks like Jodie Foster is yet another Illuminati puppet and was directly involved. You’ll have to accept those provisionally until I get to it, but I speculate that Foster and Senior talked Junior into playing his part (literally)
At a guess, she may have told him he was going to be in a movie and it was all just a set. An “assistant director” handed him a gun with blanks then, at the right time, told him to walk to his mark and fire. That’s about all that was needed from him for the psyop, but it served as the crucial distraction for all the rest of the action.
Reagan was shot by a real assassin on a balcony overlooking the scene, and he came close but failed. All talk of this has been suppressed, but if you look around you can find that a mysterious figure--never identified, of course--was seen on the balcony by several witnesses. This was reported at the time by Judy Woodruff. She is now a prominent Establishment mouthpiece. Is it a stretch to imagine her whole career is down to falling silent about her “brush with history”?
The other two we’ve talked about: they just fell down on the sidewalk. Not hard to pull off. Interestingly, I watched three brief mainstream interviews with Junior after his release. Throughout his profuse apologies, Hinckley never mentioned them by name. Like, “Sorry about the other people, too.” Pretty heartfelt, given only 40 years to reflect on his actions. Only one of the three reporters ever states their names. Why? Those other two VicSims are to be removed from your consciousness, lest the light goes on in your head about those fakers like it did in mine.
Finally, James Brady. I don’t even care enough about any of this to look in to his story, but let me assume his gunshot injury was real. I’d speculate that, in all the confusion, someone just stepped up next to him and popped him in the head. Maybe it could have been anybody and it turned out to be Brady. Then they could have presented us with at least one real victim to focus on, taking our eyes off the late President.
Interestingly, a distraction shooter and a real one simply walking up and firing is exactly what conspiracists are supposed to believe happened at the RFK assassination. Double-interestingly, the RFK assassination was faked. Triple-interestingly, If you work through all the permutations of what you believe about this aspect with Brady and RFK, you’ll either agree with me, agree with the normies, or be a hypocrite. All pretty bad, right?
Anyway, in the Reagan event, instead of dying Brady just got his brain fucked up or whatever. Well, even better (for Them)! Look at the incredible mileage They got out of him towards gun control. Immeasurable. Instead of only a martyr to the cause of gun grabbing, how incredibly effective it is to have someone with a fucked up head who talks like a retard going around saying guns ‘r’ bad, m’kay?
It was so effective that we saw a repeat of all this with the fake Gabbie Giffords. Note that They did not get a fraction out of her of what They did with Brady. I think that’s because she wasn’t actually fucked up. People could detect that on a subconscious level and refused to buy in. That reflexively goes back to Brady to indicate he really was shot. In any case, They shuffled Gabbie’s dumb ass off the stage now.
If you made it this far, I promised I would give some sort of justification as to why you should think any of this is important. Here it is as a counter-factual: what if the plan had actually succeeded? Bush the Elder gets in four years earlier, and maybe the Reign of Magog then extends for an additional term. All of “Their” plans are much farther along. Specifically, Obama the “set up pitcher” does his job, and Hellary successfully comes in as the “closer”.
They say the bullet stopped less than an inch from Reagan’s heart.
All sounds interesting except the whole "its' a set heres a prop gun go shoot the president'
Seems like a lot of leaps of faith you gloss over imo. This isn't exactly the alec baldwin situation with a nepotism hire and alphabet agency asset taking on wetworks. I agree with your bit about truth seeking vs. conspiracy theorists tho. It's what got me on the qtard mod's radar. No groups like those who go against the group think no matter how noble the group's intentions or the individual's are. Ego will be the downfall of man.
Keep in mind that Hinckley Jr. is the only one who might have been told it was a movie set, and that's pure speculation. No one knows what he was told except him and, frankly, they've had four decades to convince him of whatever they would like to convince him of.
If you watch the mainstream interviews after his release, he adds absolutely nothing to the gaping black hole where his planning and preparation for the event should be. He basically says, "I just woke up that day and decided to do it."
Everyone is free to believe that if they so choose but I do not.