protestations of faith, whilst they live a different reality
a) Faith implies consent to same; reality implies difference (life) resisting sameness (inception towards death).
"Leap of faith" aka LEAP (Hebrew; perhaps) + PERHAPS (by chance) + CHANCE (effect of an unknown cause)...being implies effect (life) within known cause (inception towards death).
b) Protestation aka PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it)...being for or against (want or not want; belief or disbelief; good or bad; true or false; confirm or deny etc.) anything suggested "affirms" the ones suggesting it through ones consent.
Example...suggested "abortion" is affirmed by both "pro-life" and "pro-choice" protests, and for those with eyes to see...Life equals choice.
c) Consenting to suggested (information; fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (inspiration; reality)...that's how one can live inside reality, while viewing it through the lens of suggested fiction. Inspiration flows; information tempts one to hold onto form, while ignoring flow.
Masons make really (just awful) protestations of faith...
a) A free mason builds within the minds/memory of others; while the path of each mason implies the 33 steps to build ones spine (33 vertebrae) aka to discern self by choosing to resist the suggestions by others. Each step slowly contradicts all the rules and regulations suggested before; hence slowly weaving all masons into a fraternity/brotherhood/collective; while simultaneously permit the mason of free (will of choice) to free oneself from those self imposed bonds to others.
Self discernment implies through SELF; not as suggested by others. Enlightenment implies ones sparking mind within light...not the fire by others.
b) Awful implies full of awe (fear), and fear implies ones consent to suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin. The foundation of fear implies death; yet being afraid implies being alive. "fear is the mind-killer"; because it tempts one to ignore that which is (life) for that which isn't (death).
You could even argue
Even implies balance; arguing implies odd choices choosing to argue against one another, while ignoring balance, which implies the origin of imbalance. Furthermore; imbalance implies IM/IN balance, hence being choice (life) within balance (inception/death)...no matter how much choice imbalances itself, life remains in-between inception and death.
was an "alt"
a) Any suggested information implies an alternative to perceivable inspiration...alternating words contradict only sound.
b) Alternative implies ALTERNATE (being by turns) NATIVE (produced by nature)...an inversion of nature producing waves (life) within line (inception towards death) aka frequency of resistance (instruments) within velocity (sound).
trauma-based mind control
a) Only within trauma (inception towards death) can there be alleviation (life) aka only within loss (velocity) can there be growth (resistance).
b) CONTROL, CONTROLL noun - "primarily, a book, register or account, kept to correct or check another account or register; a counter-register"...ones consent registers the suggestions by others as a counter-register, hence voting representatives establishing govern (to control) ment (mind/memory).
REG'ISTER, noun aka RE (respond to) GERO (to carry) implies ones free will of choice to take on suggested information; while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto...it's a fleeting flow-state going through each one open to it. The more suggested one carries; the more one closes self off from perceivable.
From the memory perspective...ram adapts to flow (inspiration); hard-drive accumulates form (information). Look at how ram responds if hard-drive reaches capacity...
probably goes back to the Egyptians
Egypt aka gypsy aka "vagabond; rootless; nomadic", hence bound to wander; a seed spreading over every soil; pasteurization of territory. Meanwhile; nature establishes each one within as center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable)...a gypsy moves center into circumference. That's the jewish nature; that which imbalances balance by tempting choice.
From the memory perspective...ram adapts to flow (inspiration); hard-drive accumulates form (information). Look at how ram responds if hard-drive reaches capacity...
LOL, what happens when an unstoppable force (ram) meets an immovable object (hard drive)?
I think we solved it boys. The flow reverses without stopping.
what happens when an unstoppable force (ram) meets an immovable object (hard drive)?
a) "meeting" implies matter set apart from one another coming together; which can only happen inside motion, because motion generates momentum (inception towards death) which separates matter (life) from one another.
b) "immovable" implies matter enabled (able) within (im) motion (mov)
c) Others suggest cessation of motion (stop), which implies ones ignorance of being (life) moved (inception towards death). Others also suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing; not) to tempt one consent to de-nial perceivable.
That's how immovable can be defined as "not moving" and a conflict of reason between stoppable vs unstoppable can exist within constant motion by exploiting ones willing denial of reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggestion).
c) Hard-drive implies motion driving (inception towards death) hard matter (life). Living within process of dying also implies a solid-state drive within a liquid system.
d) A ram has access to moving input (perceivable) before a hard-drive can be added to the operating system (perception) for storage (suggested).
RAM (random access memory)
a) RANDOM aka (course without direction) implies oneself wandering (life) within direction (inception towards death); yet lacking self discernment about it.
Motion implies velocity; which implies direction, hence implication (if/then aka from/to aka action/reaction aka loss/growth etc.). Furthermore; the term "without" implies being within (life) outside (inception towards death), hence as choice in-between sides (need/want balance) aka at the ledge of knowing (knowledge).
b) ACCESS implies motion generating entrance (inception) and exit (death) for matter (life) in-between. Inception towards life implies coming to be, hence access granted aka admission to sexual intercourse aka AD'MIT (to suffer to enter) TO (towards) SEXUAL (Latin seco; to divide) INTER (internal) COURSE (solid wandering within fluid direction).
Ones consent to suggestions by others permits other to vet entrance to suggested; hence others being enabled to deny ones access.
c) MEMORY aka MEM (mind) ORY (oration; utter)...utter implies outer, hence outer (perceivable) towards inner (perception). Others mimic utter/outer by uttering suggested words, which distract one from perceivable sound...if one consents. Doing so permits others to write suggested information into ones mind/memory, while oneself ignores perceivable inspiration.
I think we solved it boys
a) Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
b) Ignoring self for others tempts one to ignore being (life) dissolved (inception towards death), hence existing inside (living) a solution (process of dying).
Others suggest one to solve problems and to seek solutions as the inversion of being problem (temporary growth) within solution (ongoing loss). Suggesting others to seek implies "to inquire for; to ask for; to solicit; to endeavor to find or gain by any means" aka a typical merchant sales-pitch, and ones consent implies the price payed for selling self out to others.
If one lacks to comprehend this, then that's because the words others are suggesting implies the ongoing sales-pitch of the happy merchant of temptations, who use spell-craft to solicit fiction (suggested information) into reality (perceivable inspiration), which the suggesting merchant establishes within ones consenting mind/memory.
Wholesale (perceivable) or retail/retell (suggested)...it's ones free will of choice.
flow reverses without stopping
a) Stop (cessation of motion) implies matter willing ignoring motion by holding onto other matter.
b) RE (response to) VERSE (verto, to turn)...being implies wave (growth) within line (loss); if a wave turns within line, then it establishes a tunnel (circular movement) before breaking down, hence top trying to reach its own bottom (ouroboros).
Others tempt one into circular-form (reasoning over suggested); while ignoring wave-form (growth within loss), as to break one on the shore. It's called surfing...any you're doing it within the internal-net right now.
a) Faith implies consent to same; reality implies difference (life) resisting sameness (inception towards death).
"Leap of faith" aka LEAP (Hebrew; perhaps) + PERHAPS (by chance) + CHANCE (effect of an unknown cause)...being implies effect (life) within known cause (inception towards death).
b) Protestation aka PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it)...being for or against (want or not want; belief or disbelief; good or bad; true or false; confirm or deny etc.) anything suggested "affirms" the ones suggesting it through ones consent.
Example...suggested "abortion" is affirmed by both "pro-life" and "pro-choice" protests, and for those with eyes to see...Life equals choice.
c) Consenting to suggested (information; fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (inspiration; reality)...that's how one can live inside reality, while viewing it through the lens of suggested fiction. Inspiration flows; information tempts one to hold onto form, while ignoring flow.
a) A free mason builds within the minds/memory of others; while the path of each mason implies the 33 steps to build ones spine (33 vertebrae) aka to discern self by choosing to resist the suggestions by others. Each step slowly contradicts all the rules and regulations suggested before; hence slowly weaving all masons into a fraternity/brotherhood/collective; while simultaneously permit the mason of free (will of choice) to free oneself from those self imposed bonds to others.
Self discernment implies through SELF; not as suggested by others. Enlightenment implies ones sparking mind within light...not the fire by others.
b) Awful implies full of awe (fear), and fear implies ones consent to suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin. The foundation of fear implies death; yet being afraid implies being alive. "fear is the mind-killer"; because it tempts one to ignore that which is (life) for that which isn't (death).
Even implies balance; arguing implies odd choices choosing to argue against one another, while ignoring balance, which implies the origin of imbalance. Furthermore; imbalance implies IM/IN balance, hence being choice (life) within balance (inception/death)...no matter how much choice imbalances itself, life remains in-between inception and death.
a) Any suggested information implies an alternative to perceivable inspiration...alternating words contradict only sound.
b) Alternative implies ALTERNATE (being by turns) NATIVE (produced by nature)...an inversion of nature producing waves (life) within line (inception towards death) aka frequency of resistance (instruments) within velocity (sound).
a) Only within trauma (inception towards death) can there be alleviation (life) aka only within loss (velocity) can there be growth (resistance).
b) CONTROL, CONTROLL noun - "primarily, a book, register or account, kept to correct or check another account or register; a counter-register"...ones consent registers the suggestions by others as a counter-register, hence voting representatives establishing govern (to control) ment (mind/memory).
REG'ISTER, noun aka RE (respond to) GERO (to carry) implies ones free will of choice to take on suggested information; while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto...it's a fleeting flow-state going through each one open to it. The more suggested one carries; the more one closes self off from perceivable.
From the memory perspective...ram adapts to flow (inspiration); hard-drive accumulates form (information). Look at how ram responds if hard-drive reaches capacity...
Egypt aka gypsy aka "vagabond; rootless; nomadic", hence bound to wander; a seed spreading over every soil; pasteurization of territory. Meanwhile; nature establishes each one within as center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable)...a gypsy moves center into circumference. That's the jewish nature; that which imbalances balance by tempting choice.
LOL, what happens when an unstoppable force (ram) meets an immovable object (hard drive)?
I think we solved it boys. The flow reverses without stopping.
a) "meeting" implies matter set apart from one another coming together; which can only happen inside motion, because motion generates momentum (inception towards death) which separates matter (life) from one another.
b) "immovable" implies matter enabled (able) within (im) motion (mov)
c) Others suggest cessation of motion (stop), which implies ones ignorance of being (life) moved (inception towards death). Others also suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing; not) to tempt one consent to de-nial perceivable.
That's how immovable can be defined as "not moving" and a conflict of reason between stoppable vs unstoppable can exist within constant motion by exploiting ones willing denial of reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggestion).
c) Hard-drive implies motion driving (inception towards death) hard matter (life). Living within process of dying also implies a solid-state drive within a liquid system.
d) A ram has access to moving input (perceivable) before a hard-drive can be added to the operating system (perception) for storage (suggested).
a) RANDOM aka (course without direction) implies oneself wandering (life) within direction (inception towards death); yet lacking self discernment about it.
Motion implies velocity; which implies direction, hence implication (if/then aka from/to aka action/reaction aka loss/growth etc.). Furthermore; the term "without" implies being within (life) outside (inception towards death), hence as choice in-between sides (need/want balance) aka at the ledge of knowing (knowledge).
b) ACCESS implies motion generating entrance (inception) and exit (death) for matter (life) in-between. Inception towards life implies coming to be, hence access granted aka admission to sexual intercourse aka AD'MIT (to suffer to enter) TO (towards) SEXUAL (Latin seco; to divide) INTER (internal) COURSE (solid wandering within fluid direction).
Ones consent to suggestions by others permits other to vet entrance to suggested; hence others being enabled to deny ones access.
c) MEMORY aka MEM (mind) ORY (oration; utter)...utter implies outer, hence outer (perceivable) towards inner (perception). Others mimic utter/outer by uttering suggested words, which distract one from perceivable sound...if one consents. Doing so permits others to write suggested information into ones mind/memory, while oneself ignores perceivable inspiration.
a) Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
b) Ignoring self for others tempts one to ignore being (life) dissolved (inception towards death), hence existing inside (living) a solution (process of dying).
Others suggest one to solve problems and to seek solutions as the inversion of being problem (temporary growth) within solution (ongoing loss). Suggesting others to seek implies "to inquire for; to ask for; to solicit; to endeavor to find or gain by any means" aka a typical merchant sales-pitch, and ones consent implies the price payed for selling self out to others.
If one lacks to comprehend this, then that's because the words others are suggesting implies the ongoing sales-pitch of the happy merchant of temptations, who use spell-craft to solicit fiction (suggested information) into reality (perceivable inspiration), which the suggesting merchant establishes within ones consenting mind/memory.
Wholesale (perceivable) or retail/retell (suggested)...it's ones free will of choice.
a) Stop (cessation of motion) implies matter willing ignoring motion by holding onto other matter.
b) RE (response to) VERSE (verto, to turn)...being implies wave (growth) within line (loss); if a wave turns within line, then it establishes a tunnel (circular movement) before breaking down, hence top trying to reach its own bottom (ouroboros).
Others tempt one into circular-form (reasoning over suggested); while ignoring wave-form (growth within loss), as to break one on the shore. It's called surfing...any you're doing it within the internal-net right now.