On the contrary...definition aka deaf phonetician aka being deaf to phonics (sound). Most are deaf to perceivable sound, because they consent to suggested words, hence being under the influence of spell-craft.
DEFINE, verb Latin (to end, to limit, from finis, end) contradicts being "free" will of choice.
I don't show others right or wrong definitions; I try to break definitions apart, so that others have it harder to ignore being free. I simply show the contradictions between moving reality (sound) and affixed fiction (words).
A so called jew isn't just suggesting lies; he also suggests the existence of truth within a changing system, and consenting to whatever suggested, affixes it within oneself.
a) That implies through the eyes of others aka idolatry aka eye of beholder (being holding onto).
b) To look implies to seek for; to see implies within all aka HOLY SEE (seeing within whole). Hence the allegory "looks can be deceiving".
in reality you say nothing
Aka within everything (perceivable reality aka sound) one can choose to say nothing (suggested fiction aka words). Nothing (Latin nihilo) implies ones de-nial of perceivable, when consenting to suggested nihil-ism.
On the contrary...definition aka deaf phonetician aka being deaf to phonics (sound). Most are deaf to perceivable sound, because they consent to suggested words, hence being under the influence of spell-craft.
DEFINE, verb Latin (to end, to limit, from finis, end) contradicts being "free" will of choice.
I don't show others right or wrong definitions; I try to break definitions apart, so that others have it harder to ignore being free. I simply show the contradictions between moving reality (sound) and affixed fiction (words).
A so called jew isn't just suggesting lies; he also suggests the existence of truth within a changing system, and consenting to whatever suggested, affixes it within oneself.
Oh very much so. I think in real life you'd stumble constantly over your words in attempts to look smart, when in reality you say nothing.
a) That implies through the eyes of others aka idolatry aka eye of beholder (being holding onto).
b) To look implies to seek for; to see implies within all aka HOLY SEE (seeing within whole). Hence the allegory "looks can be deceiving".
Aka within everything (perceivable reality aka sound) one can choose to say nothing (suggested fiction aka words). Nothing (Latin nihilo) implies ones de-nial of perceivable, when consenting to suggested nihil-ism.
A so called jew suggests "nothing" to distract gentiles from everything perceivable... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
Being implies instrument (mind structured within) aka within perceivable sound, while "mine" and "yours" implies holding onto suggested words. Letting go implies resonance; holding onto implies dissonance.
I'd mostly laugh, probably. Do you want talk on discord?
DISCORD, noun - "disagreement among persons".
One NEEDS to resist WANTED temptations.