I don't know who your MIT friend is, but we worked with virus in uni. Similar to a construction worker saying "You can't tell me bricks don't exist because I've worked with bricks."
Virus exists. I'm sorry someone fooled you. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. Although it may be possible to prove non-existence in special situations, such as showing that a container does not contain certain items, one cannot prove universal or absolute non-existence.source
The rock metaphor was simply to address a claim that virus must be A Living Organism in order to harm a person. Broken glass on the floor hurts people and glass isn't alive.
Your twist is that something must be alive to ATTACK. Which may be true--it's semantics. But being ATTACKED only applies if you're being force-inoculated by someone. The virus is the proximal weapon, the knife, not the aggressor. And you can harm yourself against it without being ATTACKED.
Now i think you're just either pretending to not understand or at worst, you are too stupid to understand...if its the second, you need to reread my comment and then look up "proof," "attack," and "intention" in the dictionary. If its the first, go fuck yourself because my friend studied this for over a fucking decade, you're just some half-wit dumbfuck on the internet. Now! Fuck off!
Just because there was nothing there doesn't mean nothing was there. Gotcha. Show me proof viruses attack cells, like ACTUAL proof, not just some.dumb fucking link you pull out of your ass that still has some.lube on it.¹ Thanks.
¹ "Logically Fallacious" is not a fucking
valid reason to put a link you nimrod!
A ROCK.CAN KILL BUT IT CAN NOT MURDER BECAUSE A ROCK CAN NOT HAVE INTENTION. FIRE HAS KILLED MILLIONS BUT IT HAS MURDERED NONE.
What would constitute proof? I could show you documentation of a plant that does NOT produce a certain protein of our choice, be administered an 'alleged virus' into the plant, and then the plant produces that certain protein of our choice.
If that's not evidence that we know what we're talking about and that viral payloads exist...
I don't know who your MIT friend is, but we worked with virus in uni. Similar to a construction worker saying "You can't tell me bricks don't exist because I've worked with bricks."
Virus exists. I'm sorry someone fooled you. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. Although it may be possible to prove non-existence in special situations, such as showing that a container does not contain certain items, one cannot prove universal or absolute non-existence. source
The rock metaphor was simply to address a claim that virus must be A Living Organism in order to harm a person. Broken glass on the floor hurts people and glass isn't alive.
Your twist is that something must be alive to ATTACK. Which may be true--it's semantics. But being ATTACKED only applies if you're being force-inoculated by someone. The virus is the proximal weapon, the knife, not the aggressor. And you can harm yourself against it without being ATTACKED.
Now i think you're just either pretending to not understand or at worst, you are too stupid to understand...if its the second, you need to reread my comment and then look up "proof," "attack," and "intention" in the dictionary. If its the first, go fuck yourself because my friend studied this for over a fucking decade, you're just some half-wit dumbfuck on the internet. Now! Fuck off!
Just because there was nothing there doesn't mean nothing was there. Gotcha. Show me proof viruses attack cells, like ACTUAL proof, not just some.dumb fucking link you pull out of your ass that still has some.lube on it.¹ Thanks.
¹ "Logically Fallacious" is not a fucking valid reason to put a link you nimrod!
A ROCK.CAN KILL BUT IT CAN NOT MURDER BECAUSE A ROCK CAN NOT HAVE INTENTION. FIRE HAS KILLED MILLIONS BUT IT HAS MURDERED NONE.
What would constitute proof? I could show you documentation of a plant that does NOT produce a certain protein of our choice, be administered an 'alleged virus' into the plant, and then the plant produces that certain protein of our choice.
If that's not evidence that we know what we're talking about and that viral payloads exist...
Massively available resource to generally understand the process.
YOURE A RETARD FUCK OFF. THIS CONVERSATION ENDS HERE. GO READ A BOOK AND GET BACK TO ME. THANKS.
Anything you say, brainiac.