Is this a historical being ruined, or are they looking for something on the sly?
(www.theguardian.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
You know, it's possible.
I recall seeing a picture of Chichen Itza in the modern day, only in this picture a trench near to one of the structures showed it extended several feet farther down, even though we all subconsciously assume that site and all similar were completely excavated.
I conclude that most or perhaps all ancient sites were mudflooded. Again at Chichen Itza, the landscape is completely flat in every direction for dozens of miles. There's no way dust blowing in the breeze was going to bury any of those structures no matter how long you gave it.
So could something important be buried under mudflood overburden in the area around Stonehenge. I'd say sure.
I posted this link for someone else, we already know this site is larger AND deaper. This tunnel idea keeps getting brought up anyway.
Mud flood is a good example, but so are earth mounds. This is the area that has the zodiac in the geography.
Pdf incoming ( finding this information based off of my memory today has been very difficult! I'm sorry for the pdf)
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.fbrt.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/The_British_Landscape_Zodiac.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj85anusIuDAxXMFFkFHYwtAbIQFnoECBIQBg&usg=AOvVaw3O4UHuorHUWQ9hWdY95YVp
That PDF put me in mind of a couple of other ancient landscapes laid out "as above, so below":
The Valley of the Kings and the Hopi: Constellations Send Ancient Messages (Ancient Origins 9/24/2016)
The Orion Zone: Ancient Star Cities of the American Southwest (2/17/2006)
I suspect that if we looked hard enough, we might find that most of the ancient world was designed in such a manner. I can't for the life of me imagine that there was any functional purpose to any of it. I'm fairly certain there are indeed ley lines, but these landscapes don't seem to have much necessary correlation, certainly not in detail.
It all suggests to me something completely different: those that designed these structures did it only because it seemed pleasing, and fitting, and even reverential. Their garden wasn't their front yard or even the grounds of Versailles, but the entire face of the planet itself.
So many people get black-pilled these days, and make wild claims about everything from a deranged demiurge having created the world, to demonic aliens running a simulation of it.
Such ideas are ridiculous to me. Are these notions at all consistent with the grace and power of these exquisitely designed landscapes, now occulted from our awareness? Not in the least. Nothing evil would or could design and build anything like it.
What a world that must have been, living inside a titanic work of art, architecture, and--dare I say--spirituality.
I love GH's site!
Micro, macro, biological. ~Laird Scranton
Den of Lore had some excellent guests, and took a break because he needed to focus on a baby, and the day job. Edward Nightingale was on this, for THIS topic in America. However searching pulls up American idol. If you look at the old podcasts you'll see greats.
One can only be (temporary) within known (ongoing)...others suggest "truth" to tempt temporary to hold onto, while ignoring ongoing. Ones consent to suggestions by another one establishes "double" aka dualism, hence binding oneself to another one.
Thanks.