Neo-atheists like Bill Maher, Sam Harris and others made a career mocking God. They mock prophet Muhammad and sometimes Moses. They made a career out of mocking Jesus. Bill Maher probably can't sleep at night before mocking Jesus.
These neo atheists are mostly centrist or center right. Not sure if center left Destiny, Vaush and other Hillary Clinton also do this. But this is prevalent in Sam Harris neo-atheism fanbase.
But then I noticed something. Some of these neo-atheists start doing a mental gymnastics when it comes to Solomon, David (and sometimes about Moses too). It's like flipping a switch. Solomon and David are important to zionism. Apparently Solomon built a temple or David beat Goliath inside the temple or somewhere.
Most zionists don't want to criticize Moses. Every scripture Moses is very important. Quran has more mentions of Moses than Muhammad. However some zionists or atheists claim that Moses got high in the mountains because allegedly there were marijuana in there.
Then there is God. There is one thing zionists hate is God. There is no way to sugarcoat it Zionists are god-hating. They hate God more than they hate Palestine.
But then Zionists also believe God promised him this land. It's almost like flipping a switch. You can't have it both ways. You can't just prostrate before the grave of pedo Robert Maxwell in the morning then in the afternoon talk about god promised land. -_- god forbidden you from prostrating before Robert you know
This is inexplicable to me. If you are a neo atheist, shouldn't you be like- fudge you all fudge all scriptures, let me just Netflix and popcorn, your scriptures never mentioned Netflix, video games or popcorn so they are invalid hehehe.
But why is this strange hypocrisy happening? Shouldn't people(neo atheist) be more intellectually consistent? Go ask bill Maher about Jesus. Go ask Ben Shapiro(not atheist) about Jesus. They will start ranting about how Jesus allegedly was a 'fraud' and got killed by Romans for 'causing corruption in the land'. So they are using typical atheist talking points.
Then 10 seconds later ask them about Israel they will suddenly become very religious and big expert on old testament. No more atheistic propaganda when you question Israel's legitimacy?
Some say Maher Sam Harris are just trying to do history and not theology. Zionism is about history and not religion or something.
Okay. But there are other secular Jewish groups who point out zionists might be lying about archaeological evidence. There is no direct evidence linking Solomon to the temple walls. It's possible the temple walls are built much later, by Romans or Jews under Roman occupation or something.
This mental gymnastics only happens with the media personalities who are all zionists. If you have atheist friends who don't listen to Fox news CNN then they are probably not hypocrites when it comes to Israel and zionism.
Is there any CorbettReport or Christopher Bollyn video or book about this theological issue? Let me know if they said anything.
Summary: zionists hate God but believe that God will give him/her a land called Palestine. Why do Zionist neo atheist (Harris-Maher fans) flip a switch in their brains and become theologians when you mention Israel, even though ten seconds ago they were ranting and raving about Jesus allegedly being 'a fraud magician' who got killed by Romans for 'causing trouble' You can be either an atheist or you be a Zionist. Those 2 things are not always mutually exclusive, however for many atheistic zionists(Maher Harris ) they are.
OP knows the answers already. He's prompting conversation.
A Mohommedian will kill you, rape your wife just to humiliate her, and make a sex slave of your daughter. Mohammed took to wife a nine year old girl, so age doesn't matter.
Some nice people are Mohammedians as well, but their religion was created by Satan tricking its founder that he was the angel Gabriel. God allowed it for some reason.
There are different sects of Islam just as there is with Christianity, lumping everyone together is not productive
All major schools of Islamic jurisprudence teach the same: Mohammed was a child-raping, warmongering slaver.
There are two main sects of Islam, and their differences are not about whether or not the Quran tells them that who can or can't rape or enslave, or commit jihad in general.
Telling people that it's not productive when there is no real doctrinal difference is not productive.