The new subtle Jewish propaganda line is this: "A lot of what you see is BS with actors playing the parts seen in supposed news footage."
While this may indeed be true in some case, NOT EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE IS FAKE!
Jewish Israelis are using this subtle line to convince many that no one is dying in Gaza and that the Genocide is fake, war is fake, nothing happening there, Israelis are not genociding anyone, etc.. So that you live in a fairy land disconnected from reality. Disbelieving everything in the universe, taking no action, caring about nothing until Jewish boots stomps on and then you will really know not everything is fake.
I've seen this Israeli propaganda line get success here while being promoted by known sub-humans such as vpnsurfer: https://conspiracies.win/p/17rTBOCPUB/agent-jack-hamas/c/
That guy they try to pass as an actor is a VERY famous instrgramer who takes videos in all sorts of manner, nothing special about it, they only fake couple of photos which do not look like him, the Jews have been quite shoddy in creating this meme but I guess it worked!
I've seen this line being pushed heavily by other shils such as Jim Rizoli and many more. There propaganda is subtle but they know what they do and the demographic they target.
This: "No one could possibly know what's really happening". They keep repeating this line over and over again and people are falling for it.
I am thinking most people in conspiracy/truth circles are not very different from normies. It's terrible. It's as if they just take the opposite side of everything without thinking just like the normies, as long as they are opposed to the majority they think they are smart.
Yeah, you hit a few nails right on the head, at least as far as I've been able to figure out.
I think that the fundamental difference between the average normie and the average conspiracy theorist is that the normie takes the default mainstream as the "authority" and source of truth, and the conspiracist is handed a range of alternative authorities from which to choose. "They" flood the zone with disinfo agents and you may choose freely, because they're all wrong!
Also, the normies are comfortable because they're moving along with the herd. The conspiracists are comfortable because they're made to feel "smart" and "in the know". Well c'mon, neither of those is the path to digging out the truth. And of all the truths I've managed to dig out, zero of them made me feel more comfortable in any way.
Finally, interesting point about taking the opposite side: I postulate that may be the mechanism of why so many buy into Flat Earth. I think they dynamic is something like, "We've been lied to about everything. Now someone on YouTube tells me the damn Earth is actually flat. Well you're not going to fool me on this one any longer, NASA, no sir!"
What times we live in.
Being implies enabled as figure (life) within (inception towards death)...others suggest rhetoric (able to figure out) as the inversion thereof.
Using such rhetoric implies ones willing consent to it, hence enabling a figure of speech aka a golem controlled by others (those suggesting rhetoric).
That's me holding a mirror to your mind on contradiction. Only oneself can discern to be within (partial) outside (whole).
Foundation of differences (partials) implies sameness (whole)...ones consent to suggested THE-ism tempts one to ignore that by placing self under the authority of another, hence marking a difference as ones foundation.
a) Consenting to a suggested norm implies taking hold of it.
b) norm; normal; perpendicular aka at right angles (life) to the horizon (inception towards death) aka temporary growth within ongoing loss.
Latin perpendere - "balance carefully"...choosing to hold onto, while balancing carefully, implies balancing self.
In short...following any suggested orders (norms) tempts one to ignore resisting (living) natural order (process of dying). Suggested tempts taking; perceivable inspires giving.
Aka authorizing another by ones free will of choice, hence establishing a chosen one with ones choice.
Flood (motion) generates zone (momentum) for transformation within, hence establishing form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Does being (life) within cause (inception towards death) offers comfort for following along or does one need to resist to reinvigorate (comfort) self?
...willingly consenting to suggested the-ism and conspiracism, hence following suggested orders, while ignoring to resist natural order.
A sleight of hand for being (perception) within known (perceivable)...with the parasitic suggestion (the-ism) hiding in plain sight in-between...in THE know. That's media (Latin medius; middle) aka the suggesting middleman in-between perception and perceivable.
What if path (inception towards death) forces in (life).
a) How could digging within loss (inception towards death) make growth (life) more comfortable? How deep into loss will you dig until you realize that you're burying growth?
b) who suggests ONE "zero"? Another ONE? Putting ONEself under another ONE, when consenting to suggested "zero"...there ain't much growth in that.
Others sell suggested theism (the); mechanism; collectivism (many) and progressivism (so, into) to tempt ones consent to buy into it; while ignoring the implication (if/then) of perceivable..."of why".
Why within? Because out of! If within; then within outside. One can discern this, but juggling four -isms suggested by others doesn't help ones self discernment.
a) Does plane (inception towards death) of existence (life) sound circular?
b) Does ones consent to suggested permit others a sphere of influence?
c) KIKE; noun - "circle; ring; a visible sign of an invisible bond; no beginning; no end"
To know reality implies perceiving (effect) perceivable (cause). Others suggest HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance" as the inversion of being effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
Consenting to suggested happenings, positions one into a "happenstance", hence taking a chance aka gambling ones life one chance.
Sleight of hand: "If you change your mind (take a chance)...(Take a, take a chance-chance)...I'm the first in line...Honey, I'm still free (take a chance)"
Line (inception towards death) implies fall of men (life)...falling (loss) offers momentum for raising (growth)...to raise (resistance) while falling (velocity) requires adaptation by choice (frequency).
Repeat aka RE (response to) PETO (being driven forwards)...
Being implies one (life) different from one another within same (inception towards death)...others suggest norms to tempt consenting ones to respond alike instead of as differences.
a) everything (perceivable) can be ignored for nothing (suggested)
b) ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want) positions one within a conflict (want vs not want) called "reason". While ignoring everything; one is being tricked to just take the opposite side within conflicts of nothing aka reasoning about suggested, instead of adapting to perceivable.
c) inception and death are not adverse (in opposition) to each other, but coexist as momentum within the same direction of motion for those living within. Ignoring this, while holding onto something suggested, puts oneself into an adverse position.