Is the Iron Dome a hoax? Look into it
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
There are loads of videos of interception. It does work, and very well. Possibly the best of its kind and it's had a lot of evolution. The problem is obviously the expense, all that funding, mainly patriots, and other munitions, keeping it operating. Hence laser alternatives are emerging, but are still largely prototypes.
Doubtful.
F.e. - https://www.ynetnews.com/article/4kemkv3z2
Five out of nine intercepted - sorry, but it is very poor performance. Better than Patriot, of course :), but still far from ones that are really best of its kind. Even very old S-300 have significantly higher efficiency.
Either Iron Dome designed for the interception of the very specific targets and due to design flaws could not be upgraded for another kind, either it is yet another example of Western weapons made for the sales and shows, not for the battles.
Ep0ch is a bot account. Check his posts/comments to confirm...
The mods don't care about this, but we should stick to each other. That's why I remind you to check his information before you reply again to this bot. He is here just to make viewers doubt the original post.
Don't argue with them, expose them. And if the mods are so useless, we need to take action.
I think he is real person. And probably noticeable part of his comments will be arguing with me. :) If you want action from me against those pesky bots, you could account my dialogues with him as an attempt to distract him from other users. :)