Why aren't they under escort? They're in a war zone. It needs permits. Where are they trying to film. Why aren't they using Israeli coverage. Politically correct.
You threw around a term superficially. Non combatant. Hamas are the government in Gaza. It weaponised the population. Who are weapons. It uses them as resource for conflict. Or tell the World why hasn't Gaza made the greatest mosque on the Planet? They could've constructed a Pyramid. No chance. They just made rockets. All they did. Tunnels for rockets, more people to build rockets, for more rocket people.
I give up. Conflict sells because conflict is our nature. Worship demands sacrifice not love. There will always be the oppressed because another is the oppressor.
I understand. I thought you meant, the Strip. Sorry.
They are combatants in a way. Depends on the coverage. Also freedom of journalism can effectively be spies. Not saying it is. But it provides cover like other avenues.
Regardless common protocol in conflict and mobilisation is access and permissions.
Lebanon as well a few got hit. Dead. In the recent exchange.
It's war. That security force is in war. Unless it's using proper escort, forget it.
The problem look at it. They could be anyone.
Journalists are scum under the heel of scum, but excusing someone killing noncombatants because you want to be on their side is equally scummy.
I don't understand a word of that.
Why aren't they under escort? They're in a war zone. It needs permits. Where are they trying to film. Why aren't they using Israeli coverage. Politically correct.
You threw around a term superficially. Non combatant. Hamas are the government in Gaza. It weaponised the population. Who are weapons. It uses them as resource for conflict. Or tell the World why hasn't Gaza made the greatest mosque on the Planet? They could've constructed a Pyramid. No chance. They just made rockets. All they did. Tunnels for rockets, more people to build rockets, for more rocket people.
I give up. Conflict sells because conflict is our nature. Worship demands sacrifice not love. There will always be the oppressed because another is the oppressor.
The only way I can interpret this is that you are saying those journalists were combatans participating in the war over there.
I understand. I thought you meant, the Strip. Sorry.
They are combatants in a way. Depends on the coverage. Also freedom of journalism can effectively be spies. Not saying it is. But it provides cover like other avenues.
Regardless common protocol in conflict and mobilisation is access and permissions.