Sophists inherently hold self-contradictory beliefs. They break their own conditioning constantly; it’s just usually not as visible. They’re neurologically incapable of independent thought, so they can only parrot things that their conditioning has trained them to say and do. They have key words–“oppressor,” etc.–and these words are defined in accordance with their ideology (white, male, rich, property). Without an explicit framework of orders in which to direct these words, they float freely. It’s all Pavlovian responses without thought, and, like a dog, if there’s no direction to the behavior, it goes anywhere it pleases.
LOOK THERE IS WHITE SKIN ATTACKING BROWN SKIN. WHITE SKIN BAD BROWN SKIN GOOD. I SUPPORT BROWN SKIN.
It’s literally as simple as that. Without the “except for jews” clause put in place by their handlers, all sorts of truth gets said.
Sophists inherently hold self-contradictory beliefs. They break their own conditioning constantly; it’s just usually not as visible. They’re neurologically incapable of independent thought, so they can only parrot things that their conditioning has trained them to say and do. They have key words–“oppressor,” etc.–and these words are defined in accordance with their ideology (white, male, rich, property). Without an explicit framework of orders in which to direct these words, they float freely. It’s all Pavlovian responses without thought, and, like a dog, if there’s no direction to the behavior, it goes anywhere it pleases.
LOOK THERE IS WHITE SKIN ATTACKING BROWN SKIN. WHITE SKIN BAD BROWN SKIN GOOD. I SUPPORT BROWN SKIN.
It’s literally as simple as that. Without the “except for jews” clause put in place by their handlers, all sorts of truth gets said.