Kissinger and Soros are both ultimate globalists with the same final goal, but they had different approach to the NWO. Kissinger was for total dependence of each country on each other country so deep and exclusive that it will make globalisation inevitable and self-inplementing. Globalise first on neutral ground - trade, relations, peace, and when it is done and there could not be any really independent entity to oppose, opress the population. He did a lot on that way, destroying souverenity and independence, and nearly succeed. Soros was for different approach - brutally oppress the population into globalism.
All that regional wars and clashes, forced migration and any other stuff that could make people think about independence and souverenity, was against Kissinger plan. He thought that creation of gray race and eroding cultural and religious identity will happen by itself if people will not see an enemy, but a friend or trading partner in a foreigner. There is logic in his approach.
That is why his words today could sound like something out-of-script. Soros-like part of globalists ruining his plan with their greed, agression, arrogance and ignorance.
It is like Lenin vs Trotsky. Both are Bolsheviks, but had different approaches and had serious discord between each other.
Perhaps they are all vying for the title "King of the Jews." Who will end up taking the largest share of the credit for defeating the enemies of Israel.
Kissinger and Soros are both ultimate globalists with the same final goal, but they had different approach to the NWO. Kissinger was for total dependence of each country on each other country so deep and exclusive that it will make globalisation inevitable and self-inplementing. Globalise first on neutral ground - trade, relations, peace, and when it is done and there could not be any really independent entity to oppose, opress the population. He did a lot on that way, destroying souverenity and independence, and nearly succeed. Soros was for different approach - brutally oppress the population into globalism.
All that regional wars and clashes, forced migration and any other stuff that could make people think about independence and souverenity, was against Kissinger plan. He thought that creation of gray race and eroding cultural and religious identity will happen by itself if people will not see an enemy, but a friend or trading partner in a foreigner. There is logic in his approach.
That is why his words today could sound like something out-of-script. Soros-like part of globalists ruining his plan with their greed, agression, arrogance and ignorance.
It is like Lenin vs Trotsky. Both are Bolsheviks, but had different approaches and had serious discord between each other.
Perhaps they are all vying for the title "King of the Jews." Who will end up taking the largest share of the credit for defeating the enemies of Israel.