a) being implies inversion aka effect (perception) in lesser proportion than cause (perceivable).
b) inverse proportion (life) is opposed to direct (inception towards death).
c) choosing to ignore the above permits others to utilize suggestion for revisionism, hence being able to change labels (QAnon or Hilary Clinton) at will.
d) direction (inception towards death) presides directed (life)...others suggest presidents to tempt one to follow instead of resisting direction.
e) applauding (plausible) suggested does not gain one favor within actual (perceivable); instead one places self into disfavor by ignoring perceivable for suggested.
a) being implies inversion aka effect (perception) in lesser proportion than cause (perceivable).
b) inverse proportion (life) is opposed to direct (inception towards death).
c) choosing to ignore the above permits others to utilize suggestion for revisionism, hence being able to change labels (QAnon or Hilary Clinton) at will.
d) direction (inception towards death) presides directed (life)...others suggest presidents to tempt one to follow instead of resisting direction.
e) applauding (plausible) suggested does not gain one favor within actual (perceivable); instead one places self into disfavor by ignoring perceivable for suggested.