The entire point of freedom of speech—of speech in general—is to reach someone
a) REACH (Latin rego) - "to make straight"...being implies odds (life) within straight (inception towards death) while struggling to sustain self.
b) being alive implies sentenced from inception towards death...others suggest progressivism (points) to distract one from resisting origin.
c) fluid sound (entire) generates (general) solid instruments (partial)...others suggest affixed definitions (words) to distract one from that.
d) speech (suggested information) tempts one to ignore general sound (perceivable inspiration)...it's on oneself to resist want to hold onto suggested for need to let go of perceivable.
Think of the actual word “speech.” What is a speech? It’s a “formal address or discourse delivered to an audience.” Notice the key words here “delivered to an audience.”
a) form (life) is addressed by flow (inception towards death), hence each partial instrument (perception) being audience within whole sound (perceivable).
AUD'IENCE, noun - "hearing, or attending to sounds"...not consenting to the suggested words by others, which implies failing to attend perceivable sound.
b) perceivable sound implies actual; suggested words represent re-actual, hence being shaped within and in response to enacting sound.
c) what is speech? Ones consent to suggested spell-craft aka a LETTER (one who permits) aka an idol worshiper (upholding suggested within perceivable) aka one who consents to a death sentence, when permitting others to appoint definitions.
A speech without an audience is just a monologue delivered to yourself.
MONO (one) LOG (logic; reason + logos; word)...reasoning about suggested information (words) represents ones internal monologue aka ones ignorance of perceivable inspiration (sound).
ones internal monologue aka ones ignorance of perceivable inspiration (sound).
I am one of the few (30%?) who has an ongoing inner dialogue. I only recently found this out when a study was shared online about how over half of people have no monologue going on inside their own conscious. I do not usually say monologue because there's not just one, but multiple voices in my head arguing every choice and decision. Perhaps one voice is my ego and another voice is the proverbial angel on my shoulder and there's probably another voice more representative of a devil telling me to do whatever i can get away with and there's another voice that is a constant skeptic or distrustful defense mechanism.
I am capable of having internal dialogue without ignoring external perceivable sound/inspiration.
In other words I can walk and chew gum at the same time, so to speak.
a) inner (life) implies temporary; outer (inception towards death) implies ongoing, hence outer (loss) sustaining inner (growth).
b) dialogue aka DI (division) LOG (logic; reason + logos; word)...inner reasoning over suggested words tempts one to ignore outer flow of perceivable sound.
found this out when a study was shared
a) your consent to that shared study established a foundation of suggested information within your mind/memory, which tempts you to ignore "found out" aka outside foundation of perceivable inspiration.
b) ones consent to suggested studies establish others as master (teacher) and self as slave (student), hence STUDY (to fix the mind closely upon a subject).
Mind/memory needs to adapt to fluid (inspiration), which requires one to resist the want to affix (information).
I do not usually say monologue because there's not just one, but multiple voices in my head
Mono refers to one-self; multiple voices in "ones" head implies as counted by one-self. Consider if it's same sound uttered in different voices, instead of "multiple" voices?
Each different voice responds to the same sound, yet most are falling for the temptation of what others are shaping with voice...words; definitions; idols; brands; letters; numbers; names; symbolism etc.
in my head arguing
Aka reasoning over suggested information aka conflict.
every choice and decision
a) EV'ERY (each individual of a whole collection or aggregate number)...it's ones individual choice which chooses to collect or aggregate suggested numbers. Try each (single) instead of every (plural)...
b) DECI'DE (to determine; to form a definite opinion; to come to a conclusion)...being alive implies in-between initiation (inception) and conclusion (death). Form (solid) implies within flow (fluid), hence not definite (affixed).
ego; angel; devil
EGO... mind/memory filled with suggested information; tempting one to remain within self, while ignoring to adapt to outside
ANGEL... ones angular perspective when horizontal (need/want) meets vertical (inception towards death) establishing ones choice to guard ones life, hence guardian angle/angel.
DEVIL - Latin; to calumniate aka shirking of ones response-ability (choice) by blaming others for consequences.
defense mechanism
a) suggested mechanism tempts one to ignore natural employment for artificial work (Latin machina).
b) defense (life) within offense (inception towards death) implies resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
c) Nature offers (offense); resisting fertilizes ones resistance (defense)...others tempt one to get offended by consenting to their proposed offering (suggested information).
I am capable of having internal dialogue without ignoring external perceivable sound/inspiration.
a) CAPABLE (able to hold or contain)...perception cannot hold onto or contain perceivable inspiration, yet others can tempt one to hold onto and contain suggested information within ones mind/memory.
b) consider if you internally recreate perceivable inspiration (sound) with suggested information (words); hence reasoning over contradicting definitions for a system that already moved on, hence further contradicting whatever you hold onto?
c) internal implies different from external...do you use the same language for both? Try to use a secondary language internally and your primary language externally to regain control over your ego. Languages represent operating systems with a backdoor (suggested information) to others.
The trick...OPERATE (to produce by agency). Being implies regent (life) produced within agency (inception towards death), hence representing a regent SYSTEM (Latin systema; Gr. to set; assemblage of partials within whole).
In short...oneself represents system within operation; others suggest one to consent to hold onto operating systems (languages).
a) REACH (Latin rego) - "to make straight"...being implies odds (life) within straight (inception towards death) while struggling to sustain self.
b) being alive implies sentenced from inception towards death...others suggest progressivism (points) to distract one from resisting origin.
c) fluid sound (entire) generates (general) solid instruments (partial)...others suggest affixed definitions (words) to distract one from that.
d) speech (suggested information) tempts one to ignore general sound (perceivable inspiration)...it's on oneself to resist want to hold onto suggested for need to let go of perceivable.
a) form (life) is addressed by flow (inception towards death), hence each partial instrument (perception) being audience within whole sound (perceivable).
AUD'IENCE, noun - "hearing, or attending to sounds"...not consenting to the suggested words by others, which implies failing to attend perceivable sound.
b) perceivable sound implies actual; suggested words represent re-actual, hence being shaped within and in response to enacting sound.
c) what is speech? Ones consent to suggested spell-craft aka a LETTER (one who permits) aka an idol worshiper (upholding suggested within perceivable) aka one who consents to a death sentence, when permitting others to appoint definitions.
MONO (one) LOG (logic; reason + logos; word)...reasoning about suggested information (words) represents ones internal monologue aka ones ignorance of perceivable inspiration (sound).
I am one of the few (30%?) who has an ongoing inner dialogue. I only recently found this out when a study was shared online about how over half of people have no monologue going on inside their own conscious. I do not usually say monologue because there's not just one, but multiple voices in my head arguing every choice and decision. Perhaps one voice is my ego and another voice is the proverbial angel on my shoulder and there's probably another voice more representative of a devil telling me to do whatever i can get away with and there's another voice that is a constant skeptic or distrustful defense mechanism.
I am capable of having internal dialogue without ignoring external perceivable sound/inspiration.
In other words I can walk and chew gum at the same time, so to speak.
a) inner (life) implies temporary; outer (inception towards death) implies ongoing, hence outer (loss) sustaining inner (growth).
b) dialogue aka DI (division) LOG (logic; reason + logos; word)...inner reasoning over suggested words tempts one to ignore outer flow of perceivable sound.
a) your consent to that shared study established a foundation of suggested information within your mind/memory, which tempts you to ignore "found out" aka outside foundation of perceivable inspiration.
b) ones consent to suggested studies establish others as master (teacher) and self as slave (student), hence STUDY (to fix the mind closely upon a subject).
Mind/memory needs to adapt to fluid (inspiration), which requires one to resist the want to affix (information).
Mono refers to one-self; multiple voices in "ones" head implies as counted by one-self. Consider if it's same sound uttered in different voices, instead of "multiple" voices?
Each different voice responds to the same sound, yet most are falling for the temptation of what others are shaping with voice...words; definitions; idols; brands; letters; numbers; names; symbolism etc.
Aka reasoning over suggested information aka conflict.
a) EV'ERY (each individual of a whole collection or aggregate number)...it's ones individual choice which chooses to collect or aggregate suggested numbers. Try each (single) instead of every (plural)...
b) DECI'DE (to determine; to form a definite opinion; to come to a conclusion)...being alive implies in-between initiation (inception) and conclusion (death). Form (solid) implies within flow (fluid), hence not definite (affixed).
a) suggested mechanism tempts one to ignore natural employment for artificial work (Latin machina).
b) defense (life) within offense (inception towards death) implies resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
c) Nature offers (offense); resisting fertilizes ones resistance (defense)...others tempt one to get offended by consenting to their proposed offering (suggested information).
a) CAPABLE (able to hold or contain)...perception cannot hold onto or contain perceivable inspiration, yet others can tempt one to hold onto and contain suggested information within ones mind/memory.
b) consider if you internally recreate perceivable inspiration (sound) with suggested information (words); hence reasoning over contradicting definitions for a system that already moved on, hence further contradicting whatever you hold onto?
c) internal implies different from external...do you use the same language for both? Try to use a secondary language internally and your primary language externally to regain control over your ego. Languages represent operating systems with a backdoor (suggested information) to others.
The trick...OPERATE (to produce by agency). Being implies regent (life) produced within agency (inception towards death), hence representing a regent SYSTEM (Latin systema; Gr. to set; assemblage of partials within whole).
In short...oneself represents system within operation; others suggest one to consent to hold onto operating systems (languages).