Did Catholicism Create Islam?
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Well, it does point to that. Islam is around 400 years after Catholicism and they fall for the trinity theory, and actually Muhammed is playing the role of the messiah.
Dr. David Wood makes great points dissecting Islam. I had some videos of rabbis that said "Islam is the broom that is used against Christianity", but for some reason I cannot find it. But I know for a fact it's here at the end - https://conspiracies.win/p/16c2MtYigt/europe-on-fire-documentary/c/
Some theorize that Muhammed is the false prophet mentioned in Revelations. I am not so sure, but Islam covers 1/3 of the religious people around the world. Even if he was just demented, the power structure created on Islam is currently the most active.
I just hope people don't fall for the false belief that Muslims know about Jesus, as I did initially. Turns out their Jesus is their own invention, not the actual one. Anyway, Dr. David Wood is exposing the lies in the Quran and I recommend him for further understanding on the Muslims' religious books.
Yeah, if I remember correctly they delegate Jesus to having been a lesser prophet. According to them, He didn’t even die on the cross, having substituted a look alike in secret to avoid such a humiliating death.
a) DAVID (king of israel and judah) from Hebrew Dawidh -"beloved friend"; hence beloved friend (david) erect penis (wood).
b) a docked oar (doctor) prevents a vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death) from steering.
c) a suggested point (end of sentence) tempts one to ignore ones ongoing life-sentence.
d) DISSECT (to divide) TION (action) implies action (inception towards death) dividing into reactions (life).
e) to dissect (divide) islam (submission) would imply ones consent to submit to the suggestion of another. This is being inverted by questioning how Islam divides others (broom used against Christianity), which represents a contradiction in itself, since one uses a broom to bring dirt together; not to set it apart.
Suggested dehumanization in the name of others.
a) mocking free will of choice implies ones ignorance of being free will of choice, hence ones lack of self discernment.
b) for many "free-will-of-choice" represents a suggested name; while few discern the implication of each one representing free will of choice. Putting in the effort represents a testament (test of mind) for ones self discernment.
c) why would you exchange "choice" for "joooo" instead of "will"? Doing so shapes a "jooo" into a chosen one.
Using suggested words over perceivable sound implies "one corresponding to the other" (double). Therefore; "double" represents the status quo for speaking, which tempts one to ignore that nature doesn't speak (articulation of sound), because sound represents natural; and words represent artificial.
Aka ones consent to suggested nihilism (0) and dualism (2), while ignoring perceivable units (1). Furthermore; the point "." (end of sentence) implies ones consent to suggested progressivism, while ignoring ones ongoing life-sentence.
a) Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary is right now on it's eleventh edition, which implies that those who dictate expressions by words are editing definitions; hence continuously changing them.
b) the few suggest written dictionaries, while the many consent to RE (respond to) WRITE (written by) them.
tl; dr...how about adding an example for a re-written word to your accusatory comment?
I will never figure out how are bots like this still not blocked by the mods?
Anyway, I have a block feature for that.
Can you show me a "bot" that can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly?
a) Still implies "cessation of motion", hence only within everything moving can one suggest stillness....others suggest nihilism (not; nothing) as the inversion thereof.
b) If nothing can have cessation of motion, then that implies nothing can move. How could something moving be nothing?
Aka ones free will of choice to ignore...others suggest "block-features" to tempt one to consent to suggested (fiction); while ignoring perceivable (reality).
Others suggest the-ism to tempt one to submit to their authority; while ignoring to utilize ones free will of choice to moderate self.
Furthermore; choice can only exist within balance; which represents limit (moderation) for choice. Only within "dom"-inance of balance can there be "free" will of choice aka free-dom.
Edit: ones consent to suggested the-ism implies ones submission to others, hence ISLAM.