:D "For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted." - Matthew 23:12
You make sure you Turn To God, hypicrite. :D
Of course you will run away from an argument that exposes you as a fool. :D Typical. Your arrogance writes comments, that you cannot check, snowflake. :D Sorry, you're so uneducated on topics that you talk about. Perhaps you need to shut up. :)
I don't think your ignorance of carbon nanotubes and graphene reflects on your status with God. But your unwillingness to be humble and accept correction could be.
I think you're projecting, with all due respect. What I said in my comment is correct, you didn't understand your own source if you think it contradicts me.
Have you read the source? :D Quote me whatever you think contradicts me. :D
How ironic. :D You blame me for projecting and couldn't even face the facts in the link I've shared... :D And I am projecting? :D You hipocrite... :D
You ignoring all my other points in the comments just proves my point. You haven't turned to God, clearly. Drawn in your arrogance then. I gave it an honest shot.
The part of the paper where it draws a clear distinction between graphene and carbon nanotubes (as I did). They are not the same thing. It's in the first paragraph.
A few years back, Tour developed a process for “unzipping” carbon nanotubes so that they transformed into graphene.
They have to be transformed to be graphene (or vice versa). So you didn't read or comprehend the first paragraph of the source you used. You're completely talking out of your ass, with all due respect.
And you still haven't addressed the issue of the quantity of material. So I already dismantled your arguments (and alleged evidence) and you don't have a rebuttal besides getting mad.
It's how the structure changes... From a tube to a 2d plane... Dude, read the whole paragraph... :D
Are you projecting something? Or just very unclear on physics? "Unzipping" is used to describe how a 3d tube is "unzipped", so it can become a 2d plane... Should I really explain terms that are explained in the same paragraph? :D
Anyway, bot. Stay humble. I am not getting mad... you seem confused... :D Why would I get mad about that? Read the whole thing, you might learn something...
:D "For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted." - Matthew 23:12
You make sure you Turn To God, hypicrite. :D
Of course you will run away from an argument that exposes you as a fool. :D Typical. Your arrogance writes comments, that you cannot check, snowflake. :D Sorry, you're so uneducated on topics that you talk about. Perhaps you need to shut up. :)
I don't think your ignorance of carbon nanotubes and graphene reflects on your status with God. But your unwillingness to be humble and accept correction could be.
I think you're projecting, with all due respect. What I said in my comment is correct, you didn't understand your own source if you think it contradicts me.
Have you read the source? :D Quote me whatever you think contradicts me. :D
How ironic. :D You blame me for projecting and couldn't even face the facts in the link I've shared... :D And I am projecting? :D You hipocrite... :D
You ignoring all my other points in the comments just proves my point. You haven't turned to God, clearly. Drawn in your arrogance then. I gave it an honest shot.
The part of the paper where it draws a clear distinction between graphene and carbon nanotubes (as I did). They are not the same thing. It's in the first paragraph.
They have to be transformed to be graphene (or vice versa). So you didn't read or comprehend the first paragraph of the source you used. You're completely talking out of your ass, with all due respect.
And you still haven't addressed the issue of the quantity of material. So I already dismantled your arguments (and alleged evidence) and you don't have a rebuttal besides getting mad.
Absolutely hilarious! :D
It's how the structure changes... From a tube to a 2d plane... Dude, read the whole paragraph... :D
Are you projecting something? Or just very unclear on physics? "Unzipping" is used to describe how a 3d tube is "unzipped", so it can become a 2d plane... Should I really explain terms that are explained in the same paragraph? :D
Anyway, bot. Stay humble. I am not getting mad... you seem confused... :D Why would I get mad about that? Read the whole thing, you might learn something...