Why are they using Facebook? At what point is anybody using Facebook. When will niggers learn that they're niggers. Nothing more than dumb herded cattle.
Use WhatsApp. Use an email. Use anything other than Social Media. Facebook. Why? It isn't a solution for anybody. Connectivity with who. They didn't have your email or number. They can fuck right off. Why has a stalker group got your shit. Look it's Abdul from Nigeria liking your family pictures. Why has China. Why has Zuckerturd. It was a means of monitoring you, it even says so, collecting all your details, all your info, and invasely bombarding you with ads for even more premiums, while policing the crap out of you.
I swear people get dumber by the fucking day. Autism everywhere. What did people use before Facebook? How did they communicate? They were a lot smarter than they are now. Government didn't ban them off Facebook.
DUMB, adjective - "mute; silent; not speaking". As in..."I was dumb with silence; I held my peace." ~Psalms 34:1.
Suggesting each other to be dumb breaks that sworn oath of implied silence; while others then suggest social media to harvest all that noise.
autism everywhere
One positions self under those who're suggesting -isms, when consenting to them. So instead of everywhere it's always underneath a chosen one.
What did people use before Facebook?
They booked faces of others within their mind/memory under suggested names, hence branding others while marking self. Others suggest facebook to externalize this internal process.
How did they communicate?
COMMUNICATE, verb - "to impart; to give to another"...hence suggesting words (fiction) to tempt each other to ignore sound (reality).
In reality...nature represents sound (entire) and each partial within resonates with it. Communicating by suggested words implies dissonance within perceivable sound. Others call this communication "spell-craft".
kind of absurd that this is what qualifies as "news"
If one consents to what another suggests; then one puts self into center of surrounding N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh). Others can define ones worldview if one consents to what they're suggesting.
While consenting to suggested; one becomes ABSURD', adjective - "deaf, insensible" to perceivable.
Facebook is a complete shithole. Conspiracies hit social media regarding the origin of the fires. So government tells social media and then ZuckerTurd bans every Wildfire story.
Local news, opinions on anything is fully policed by that asshat. Facebook has been the worst since day one. Since the hacking scandals. Nobody needed it. I am sure I could reconnect with people lost. But why would I trade it for freedom? The people I lost I don't even want to find, school friends, distant cousins abroad. That price is being compromised? These people today since this shit. Where are their pictures? These stupid phones on Facebook, not on their walls, where? Everybody else sees them except the people who matter.
I know people who were really into it. Family members. Post Post. Nothing but trouble. A family member lost a job from a post. Security of a Uni, socialised with at the Uni bar they took pictures and posted. Hardly any age difference. A lil not much. But Gone.Others have had their account locked in Covid. Others stalked and abused. Trolled by woke stupid activists they were in an otherwise club, discussing as elderly a group event, but it adds. My niece had a stalker as well. Nothing but trouble.
a) who dug the hole by voluntary subscribing and who filled that hole with shitty information?
b) what if suggested cannot be complete; only distract perceiving partials from perceivable whole? For those who consent to suggested facebook; it can be perceived as complete, since they're willingly ignore everything else.
But why would I trade...
TRADE, noun - "instruments (life) of any occupation (inception towards death)". Being implies traded...others suggest trading among each other to distract from that.
A TRA'ITOR, noun (Latin trado, to deliver.) ignores being (life) delivered (inception towards death)...
nothing but trouble
Being implies trouble (life) within care (inception towards death), hence everything perceivable sustaining each perceiving ones troubles...unless ignored. Others suggest the inversion thereof as "nothing but trouble".
Why are they using Facebook? At what point is anybody using Facebook. When will niggers learn that they're niggers. Nothing more than dumb herded cattle.
Use WhatsApp. Use an email. Use anything other than Social Media. Facebook. Why? It isn't a solution for anybody. Connectivity with who. They didn't have your email or number. They can fuck right off. Why has a stalker group got your shit. Look it's Abdul from Nigeria liking your family pictures. Why has China. Why has Zuckerturd. It was a means of monitoring you, it even says so, collecting all your details, all your info, and invasely bombarding you with ads for even more premiums, while policing the crap out of you.
I swear people get dumber by the fucking day. Autism everywhere. What did people use before Facebook? How did they communicate? They were a lot smarter than they are now. Government didn't ban them off Facebook.
Whatsapp is facebook owned
Yes but it doesn't censor. Despite it being compromised.
DUMB, adjective - "mute; silent; not speaking". As in..."I was dumb with silence; I held my peace." ~Psalms 34:1.
Suggesting each other to be dumb breaks that sworn oath of implied silence; while others then suggest social media to harvest all that noise.
One positions self under those who're suggesting -isms, when consenting to them. So instead of everywhere it's always underneath a chosen one.
They booked faces of others within their mind/memory under suggested names, hence branding others while marking self. Others suggest facebook to externalize this internal process.
COMMUNICATE, verb - "to impart; to give to another"...hence suggesting words (fiction) to tempt each other to ignore sound (reality).
In reality...nature represents sound (entire) and each partial within resonates with it. Communicating by suggested words implies dissonance within perceivable sound. Others call this communication "spell-craft".
SM'ART, verb - "to be punished; to bear penalties or the evil consequences of any thing." https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/smart
There's only now and ignoring it punishes ones mind/memory.
boomer niggers use facebook.. thats it...
The spirit of this comment is correct and kind of absurd that this is what qualifies as "news"
If one consents to what another suggests; then one puts self into center of surrounding N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh). Others can define ones worldview if one consents to what they're suggesting.
While consenting to suggested; one becomes ABSURD', adjective - "deaf, insensible" to perceivable.
Facebook is a complete shithole. Conspiracies hit social media regarding the origin of the fires. So government tells social media and then ZuckerTurd bans every Wildfire story.
Local news, opinions on anything is fully policed by that asshat. Facebook has been the worst since day one. Since the hacking scandals. Nobody needed it. I am sure I could reconnect with people lost. But why would I trade it for freedom? The people I lost I don't even want to find, school friends, distant cousins abroad. That price is being compromised? These people today since this shit. Where are their pictures? These stupid phones on Facebook, not on their walls, where? Everybody else sees them except the people who matter.
I know people who were really into it. Family members. Post Post. Nothing but trouble. A family member lost a job from a post. Security of a Uni, socialised with at the Uni bar they took pictures and posted. Hardly any age difference. A lil not much. But Gone.Others have had their account locked in Covid. Others stalked and abused. Trolled by woke stupid activists they were in an otherwise club, discussing as elderly a group event, but it adds. My niece had a stalker as well. Nothing but trouble.
a) who dug the hole by voluntary subscribing and who filled that hole with shitty information?
b) what if suggested cannot be complete; only distract perceiving partials from perceivable whole? For those who consent to suggested facebook; it can be perceived as complete, since they're willingly ignore everything else.
TRADE, noun - "instruments (life) of any occupation (inception towards death)". Being implies traded...others suggest trading among each other to distract from that.
A TRA'ITOR, noun (Latin trado, to deliver.) ignores being (life) delivered (inception towards death)...
Being implies trouble (life) within care (inception towards death), hence everything perceivable sustaining each perceiving ones troubles...unless ignored. Others suggest the inversion thereof as "nothing but trouble".