ATTENTION: Calling all Flat Earther FREAKS!!!
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
There wasn't much in this video about flat earth except a tid bit at the end.
The video was interesting, nevertheless. But it failed to focus on one core subject.
This forum is hostile toward flat earth theorists. Count me as someone who finds flat earth theories interesting. I like to listen to the theories and consider both sides of the debate. I am not one to mock flat earth theorists. I am not 100% convinced the planet is a spinning globe. I am not convinced it is flat either. I admit I do not know for sure. The globe theory makes sense to me but it also is something I'm not able to prove on my own. Plus NASA seems very deceptive to me. The moon landings seem very fake to me and I do believe there is lots of hidden knowledge about what these UFO's really are, what satellite technology really is, etc. I kind of find it peculiar and strange we only ever see one side of the moon. Yes there is an explanation for it but it just seems to convenient to me. Also, some of the NEW video footage from NASA looks even more fake to me than the old moon landing footage from the 60's. For example that DART project blowing up an asteroid looked fake as fuck to me. And the video footage of the astronauts with watches floating on their wrists looked like CGI editing
I like flat earth theory because it kind of forces you to relearn things from the ground up without trusting jewish published books or authority. If the world is a round sphere spinning thousands of miles per hour, how can i prove that to myself without relying on someone else's word or some deemed authority.
Maybe there are other subjects we need to relearn from the ground up, such as virology, medicine, nutrition, etc.
Your position on FE is exactly my position. There are too many deceptions and unanswered questions to simply ignore, but I am not fully convinced.
I've been researching FB for over 10 years, and it's certainly not easy to prove. For example, visible lasers over 20 miles certainly prove that the surface appears to be either flat or way larger than the official numbers suggest, but who's to say we are not on a planet that is gigantic, like 10x the size we know, and that we are trapped in some managed zone? How do orbits work? I know there are balloons up there as well, but certainly what I see traveling thousands of miles per hour across the night sky moving across the sky are not speeding balloons.
The things that we are trying to understand are things like "if everything they're telling us is real then why are they faking all the footage from me ISS?", etc. It's not to say that we can't prove the existing model is wrong in at least some ways, but we certainly can't easily prove whatever the correct model is. It's quite possible that FE is in fact a psy-op, but but that the real truth it's hiding is even weirder. If we get pigeonholed into one way of thinking and ignore inconvenient or hard to explain observations, then we will not really understand the system.