It’s weird how some people think loli is like methadone for pedos. “Of course they won’t act on their impulse with a real child if they can just jerk off at home with a picture!” If that were true then rape would be a thing of the past after nudie mags porn and the internet hit the scene. But we know it isn’t.
The same amount of mass killings that Ghengis Khan inspired? We can all point to something in history that’s full of awful things and say “see no one’s emulating that!”
But we know people are stupid and easily lead by pictures and stupid shit. You can’t look at the last few years and be on a conspiracy forum and NOT know that. So since easily impressionable morons exist, maybe MAYBE having pictures of naked children around and them being seen as socially acceptable is a bad thing?
Like seriously why do you even WANT naked child pictures, drawn or not? I don’t see why ANYONE would want naked children around, cherubs be damned. How fucked do you need to be to spend hours chiseling stone into a naked child? I don’t care at all about “muh artistic freedom!” I’ve seen the comics where they use naked kids as a punchline and it’s honestly fucking cringe. Why in the blue fuck do you want a society that is okay with naked children as art? People drawing naked children should be ostracized and shunned not applauded for their stunning bravery.
Childhood innocence is a precious thing because once ruined it can NOT be replaced, fixed or undone. Kids only have a short time to be a kid and all this pushing of sexuality on them directly and by proxy is fucking disgusting. I don’t give a fuck about pearl clutching, I give a fuck why people like you want naked child art deemed okay to be everywhere. What the fuck is your deal man? Why do you want naked child “art”?
“They’re not real it’s fiction so it’s totally okay!” That’s your defence here? That it’s fine because they’re made up? “No one got hurt, no REAL child got abused so it’s totally fine! Two more soy lattes please!” You want to spread naked child pictures around without any negative repercussion, making this world more gross and gay not less, so yes you can expect pushback from people who don’t want a bunch of naked children everywhere. Things don’t exist in a vacuum, we don’t like what retards and idiots do with our nice things but we have to be careful anyways because we live in a society. Having the pail fed window lickers of society being able to see naked children in sexual situations become the “new normal” isn’t anything a sane person should want. Or do you somehow thing that loli should be okay but shota is totally wrong and will be banned? Where’s your line?
My line is simple. No naked kids, no naked kid “art”, no pedophiles, no groomers, no groomer apologists. And fuck you if you disagree.
Well, since you prefer the step that will make future pedophiles, you don't think long-term on this. :D
It’s weird how some people think loli is like methadone for pedos. “Of course they won’t act on their impulse with a real child if they can just jerk off at home with a picture!” If that were true then rape would be a thing of the past after nudie mags porn and the internet hit the scene. But we know it isn’t.
It's amazing how many users defend pedophiles nowadays...
You truly make me sick!
The same amount of mass killings that Ghengis Khan inspired? We can all point to something in history that’s full of awful things and say “see no one’s emulating that!” But we know people are stupid and easily lead by pictures and stupid shit. You can’t look at the last few years and be on a conspiracy forum and NOT know that. So since easily impressionable morons exist, maybe MAYBE having pictures of naked children around and them being seen as socially acceptable is a bad thing?
Like seriously why do you even WANT naked child pictures, drawn or not? I don’t see why ANYONE would want naked children around, cherubs be damned. How fucked do you need to be to spend hours chiseling stone into a naked child? I don’t care at all about “muh artistic freedom!” I’ve seen the comics where they use naked kids as a punchline and it’s honestly fucking cringe. Why in the blue fuck do you want a society that is okay with naked children as art? People drawing naked children should be ostracized and shunned not applauded for their stunning bravery.
Childhood innocence is a precious thing because once ruined it can NOT be replaced, fixed or undone. Kids only have a short time to be a kid and all this pushing of sexuality on them directly and by proxy is fucking disgusting. I don’t give a fuck about pearl clutching, I give a fuck why people like you want naked child art deemed okay to be everywhere. What the fuck is your deal man? Why do you want naked child “art”?
“They’re not real it’s fiction so it’s totally okay!” That’s your defence here? That it’s fine because they’re made up? “No one got hurt, no REAL child got abused so it’s totally fine! Two more soy lattes please!” You want to spread naked child pictures around without any negative repercussion, making this world more gross and gay not less, so yes you can expect pushback from people who don’t want a bunch of naked children everywhere. Things don’t exist in a vacuum, we don’t like what retards and idiots do with our nice things but we have to be careful anyways because we live in a society. Having the pail fed window lickers of society being able to see naked children in sexual situations become the “new normal” isn’t anything a sane person should want. Or do you somehow thing that loli should be okay but shota is totally wrong and will be banned? Where’s your line?
My line is simple. No naked kids, no naked kid “art”, no pedophiles, no groomers, no groomer apologists. And fuck you if you disagree.
My antisemitism runs deep. No to naked kids, full stop.
It's amazing how many users defend pedophiles nowadays...
You truly make me sick!
I see you asked your Satanist friend to defend pedophilia with you - https://paste.pics/15259a137ce0cde43bdea17cabcbfe5d
https://paste.pics/15259a137ce0cde43bdea17cabcbfe5d