Of course, the whole point of anti-police movements is to make cities so unbearable to live in that people will clamor and beg for technology controls to “restore order.”
It’s so obvious to anyone with the ability to extrapolate beyond 10 minutes.
It’s brilliant actually. Hate the police, love the police, whichever way you feel inclined you can find a reason to justify and champion that belief. If you Hate the police great! No police = facial I’d and global credit credit to buy and sell and move!
Love the police? Even better! They’ll just be more direct instruments of the state with ever broadening authority with asset forfeiture!
Heads they win, tails you lose.
a) love vs hate represents one consent to suggested moralism.
b) winning vs losing represents ones consent to suggested gambling aka progressivism.
Both suggested love/win (want) vs hate/lose (not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable need.
a reason to justify
Ones consent to want or not want anything suggested by another, shapes the want "versus" not want conflict of reason.
A reasoning mind represents a conflicted; an imbalanced mind and both sides within reason (want vs not want) are defined by the outside suggestion, hence allowing a few to control both sides of every conflict of reason the many are fighting each other over.
Of course, the whole point of anti-police movements is to make cities so unbearable to live in that people will clamor and beg for technology controls to “restore order.”
It’s so obvious to anyone with the ability to extrapolate beyond 10 minutes.
It’s brilliant actually. Hate the police, love the police, whichever way you feel inclined you can find a reason to justify and champion that belief. If you Hate the police great! No police = facial I’d and global credit credit to buy and sell and move! Love the police? Even better! They’ll just be more direct instruments of the state with ever broadening authority with asset forfeiture! Heads they win, tails you lose.
a) love vs hate represents one consent to suggested moralism.
b) winning vs losing represents ones consent to suggested gambling aka progressivism.
Both suggested love/win (want) vs hate/lose (not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable need.
Ones consent to want or not want anything suggested by another, shapes the want "versus" not want conflict of reason.
A reasoning mind represents a conflicted; an imbalanced mind and both sides within reason (want vs not want) are defined by the outside suggestion, hence allowing a few to control both sides of every conflict of reason the many are fighting each other over.
You'd need police to enforce it.
Excuse to do this everywhere.
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/facial-recognition-in-use-se-portland-jacksons-store-implements-technology-to-curb-crime/283-8ce9f30a-2ac8-4c07-9ea9-11518a75e40a