So you think. Have you actually yourself (without ChatGPT) read, analyzed and summarized the same text with your own brain?
If not , you can't know.
The whole point of ChatGPT is that it makes a convincing illusion of it acting like a human reasoner (with what looks like proper summarizing, analyzing and reasoning) when in fact it does nothing like that, because it is a programmed algorithm that can't do that even if you tried to force it to do that.
All that it does is MIMICK via pattern classification and generation . And ir WILL generate things out of thin air.
Look, I fucking understood this way back in the 90s in my cs studies , it's not like I came up this myself just to argue with you.
oh I don't know.. it did a pretty good job getting those 25 points from the Pawns in the game and also 25 points from the protocols of the elders of zion.
a) reasoning implies "reacting" to what others are suggesting...others suggest "acting" to distract from that.
b) a conflict of reason among humans tempts emotions; hence responses like : "Look, I fucking understood...it's not like I came up this myself just to argue with you".
Others can now utilize artificial suggestion (AI) without tempting themselves with emotions.
all it does is MIMICK
a) one (perceiving partial) can only mimic all (perceivable whole)...others suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to distract one from that.
b) all the parts one utilizes to shape a suggestion together were perceivable beforehand, yet the suggested togetherness tempts one to ignore perceivable apartheid.
Whenever one suggests something put together; it tempts others to ignore the partials used to put together. Why are LEGO sets more expensive than boxes of regular parts? Why are the many consenting to pay more for less?
It got a pretty good summary of those points from those couple things I asked it about.
So you think. Have you actually yourself (without ChatGPT) read, analyzed and summarized the same text with your own brain?
If not , you can't know.
The whole point of ChatGPT is that it makes a convincing illusion of it acting like a human reasoner (with what looks like proper summarizing, analyzing and reasoning) when in fact it does nothing like that, because it is a programmed algorithm that can't do that even if you tried to force it to do that.
All that it does is MIMICK via pattern classification and generation . And ir WILL generate things out of thin air.
Look, I fucking understood this way back in the 90s in my cs studies , it's not like I came up this myself just to argue with you.
oh I don't know.. it did a pretty good job getting those 25 points from the Pawns in the game and also 25 points from the protocols of the elders of zion.
a) reasoning implies "reacting" to what others are suggesting...others suggest "acting" to distract from that.
b) a conflict of reason among humans tempts emotions; hence responses like : "Look, I fucking understood...it's not like I came up this myself just to argue with you".
Others can now utilize artificial suggestion (AI) without tempting themselves with emotions.
a) one (perceiving partial) can only mimic all (perceivable whole)...others suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to distract one from that.
b) all the parts one utilizes to shape a suggestion together were perceivable beforehand, yet the suggested togetherness tempts one to ignore perceivable apartheid.
Whenever one suggests something put together; it tempts others to ignore the partials used to put together. Why are LEGO sets more expensive than boxes of regular parts? Why are the many consenting to pay more for less?