So, if the war has any validity at all, then the 'enemies' in question would be interested in stabilizing the conflict for the next few years.
At the current pace, there is no question we are in a state of global war in its infancy, as the criminals at the helm continue to pound on the war drum and provide endless hostile inputs where diplomacy should be the norm.
With no provision for diplomacy, the only choice for Russia would be to remove the leaders if they can.
So, lets hold a convention in a tiny little ineffective country, let's configure all the air defense of types already proven useless, practically right next to this so called belligerent global threat.
So, in my opinion, if Russia does not decapitate nato at this stage, then the whole thing is being orchestrated by the controlling factors and both parties in the conflict have no intention of being at 'war'
I would do it. Given the stage and intention of the group, it is the only logical course of action.
It is actually an important historical step that if taken would set precedent and basically set the stage for how the multi polar world ordering is to commence, the attitude and opposition factor is in dire need of reset.
So even tho these puppets themselves have no significant value, the story and the backdrop does. It is all about creating the image. With all of the available inputs, we are already at a stage where once this story is told, Russia is well placed hero status.
If however this is not the story told then who knows.
nato has already basically collapsed it is just not yet in paper. The total amount of capability to deliver in this war has revealed a staggering amount of corruption and useless attempts to be effective, cowardly acts and poor planning. Add this to the complete failure in Syria and the result is clear. It is over.
We are already in for what is now possibly going to be decades of war, it does not matter at this point, a bold move would chill the air and give Russia yet another edge.
Not yet. It needs few more members, preferrably from other sides of world, like Japan, some African country and so on.
Today there is only few discords between NATO members - Greece - Turkey, France - UK and possibly Sweden - Finland. But US still able to keep them calm. NATO could rot in that state for many years, to the pleasure of US MIC.
I don't think I can agree here, there is much more to it than the talking heads in the political sphere. The driving force behind nato is basically the ill conceived thought that unipolarity will survive when used against any contenders.
With a series of failures and improper utilization most people with a mind understand it to be a criminal organization beyond even the MIC in the respective countries.
I think the erosion of nato is pretty clear, now that they have this gust of wind trying to pick them up, they still have some more time, but so far nothing is valid, for me it looks like it is pretty collapsed.